Wimberly v. United States of America et al

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/30/2017 ORDERING plaintiff's appeal is frivolous and plaintiff's ifp status is REVOKED. The Clerk shall serve this order on the Ninth Circuit. (cc: Ninth Circuit, case no. 17-16281) (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LARRY WIMBERLY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-0858 KJN P v. ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 17 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned. (ECF No. 5.) 19 In this action, plaintiff sought monetary relief against defendants for past wrongs in 20 connection with the institution of slavery. On May 17, 2017, this action was dismissed and 21 judgment was entered. (ECF Nos. 6, 8.) Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the Ninth Circuit 22 Court of Appeals. (ECF No. 11). On June 28, 2017, the Ninth Circuit referred this action to the undersigned to determine 23 24 whether in forma pauperis status should continue for the appeal or whether the appeal was 25 frivolous or taken in bad faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); see also Hooker v.American Airlines, 26 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002) (revocation of in forma pauperis status is appropriate where 27 district court finds the appeal to be frivolous). 28 //// 1 1 2 For the reasons stated in the May 17, 2017 order, the undersigned finds that plaintiff’s appeal is frivolous. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. Because the appeal is frivolous, plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status is revoked; 5 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve this order on the Ninth Circuit Court of 6 Appeals. 7 Dated: June 30, 2017 8 9 10 11 12 Wim858.app 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?