Carroll v. Spearman
Filing
21
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/5/2018 ADOPTING 19 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 18 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order. (Hunt, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TREYMAYNE DEON CARROLL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-0862 JAM DB P
v.
ORDER
SPEARMAN, et al.,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights
17
18
action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States
19
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On March 20, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 19.) Plaintiff has
23
filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 20.)
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed March 20, 2018 (ECF No. 19), are adopted in
3
full;
4
5
2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order are
denied.
6
7
8
9
DATED: June 5, 2018
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?