Carroll v. Spearman

Filing 31

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 5/20/2019 DENYING without prejudice plaintiff's 30 motion for an extension of time to file an amended complaint and motion for appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TREYMAYNE DEON CARROLL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-0862 JAM DB P v. ORDER SPEARMAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner who was proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil 17 18 rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims officials at High Desert State Prison failed 19 to provide him with safe living conditions in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 20 used excessive force, and retaliated against him. On April 17, 2019, the District Judge adopted 21 the undersigned’s recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to file an amended 22 complaint, judgment was entered, and this case was closed. (ECF Nos. 28, 29.) Presently before 23 the court is plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file an amended complaint and request 24 for the appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 30.) It is not immediately clear from plaintiff’s filing 25 whether he is aware that judgment has been entered in this action. The court will not consider 26 reopening this action until such time as plaintiff files a proposed amended complaint, along with a 27 motion to reopen this action or a motion for relief from judgment. 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time 2 to file an amended complaint and motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. 30) is denied without 3 prejudice. 4 Dated: May 20, 2019 5 /s/ DEBORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 DLB:12 DLB:1/Orders/Prisoner-Civil Rights/carr0862.reopen 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?