Carroll v. Spearman
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 5/20/2019 DENYING without prejudice plaintiff's 30 motion for an extension of time to file an amended complaint and motion for appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TREYMAYNE DEON CARROLL,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-0862 JAM DB P
v.
ORDER
SPEARMAN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner who was proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil
17
18
rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims officials at High Desert State Prison failed
19
to provide him with safe living conditions in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act,
20
used excessive force, and retaliated against him. On April 17, 2019, the District Judge adopted
21
the undersigned’s recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to file an amended
22
complaint, judgment was entered, and this case was closed. (ECF Nos. 28, 29.) Presently before
23
the court is plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file an amended complaint and request
24
for the appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 30.) It is not immediately clear from plaintiff’s filing
25
whether he is aware that judgment has been entered in this action. The court will not consider
26
reopening this action until such time as plaintiff files a proposed amended complaint, along with a
27
motion to reopen this action or a motion for relief from judgment.
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time
2
to file an amended complaint and motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. 30) is denied without
3
prejudice.
4
Dated: May 20, 2019
5
/s/ DEBORAH BARNES
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
DLB:12
DLB:1/Orders/Prisoner-Civil Rights/carr0862.reopen
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?