(PC) Sapp v. Germanotta

Filing 10

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/17/2017 GRANTING plaintiff's #8 request to proceed IFP; plaintiff shall pay the $350.00 filing fee in accordance with the concurrent order to the Mahanoy State Correctional Institution; and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K) Modified on 5/17/2017 (Yin, K).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SHAMONT SAPP,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:17-cv-0863 JAM KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.
STEFANI JOANNE GERMANOTTA,

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendant.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

18

§ 1983, and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This

19

proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

20
21
22

Plaintiff submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted.
Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C.

23

§§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order, plaintiff will be assessed an initial partial filing fee in

24

accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). By separate order, the court will direct

25

the appropriate agency to collect the initial partial filing fee from plaintiff’s trust account and

26

forward it to the Clerk of the Court. Thereafter, plaintiff will be obligated to make monthly

27

payments of twenty percent of the preceding month’s income credited to plaintiff’s trust account.

28

These payments will be forwarded by the appropriate agency to the Clerk of the Court each time

1

the amount in plaintiff’s account exceeds $10.00, until the filing fee is paid in full. 28 U.S.C.

2

§ 1915(b)(2).

3

The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a

4

governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The

5

court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally

6

“frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek

7

monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1),(2).

8

A claim is legally frivolous when it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.

9

Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1227-28 (9th

10

Cir. 1984). The court may, therefore, dismiss a claim as frivolous when it is based on an

11

indisputably meritless legal theory or where the factual contentions are clearly baseless. Neitzke,

12

490 U.S. at 327. The critical inquiry is whether a constitutional claim, however inartfully

13

pleaded, has an arguable legal and factual basis. See Jackson v. Arizona, 885 F.2d 639, 640 (9th

14

Cir. 1989), superseded by statute as stated in Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1130-31 (9th Cir.

15

2000) (“[A] judge may dismiss [in forma pauperis] claims which are based on indisputably

16

meritless legal theories or whose factual contentions are clearly baseless.”); Franklin, 745 F.2d at

17

1227.

18

Rule 8(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure “requires only ‘a short and plain

19

statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief,’ in order to ‘give the

20

defendant fair notice of what the . . . claim is and the grounds upon which it rests.’” Bell Atlantic

21

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957)).

22

In order to survive dismissal for failure to state a claim, a complaint must contain more than “a

23

formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action;” it must contain factual allegations

24

sufficient “to raise a right to relief above the speculative level.” Id. at 555. However, “[s]pecific

25

facts are not necessary; the statement [of facts] need only ‘give the defendant fair notice of what

26

the . . . claim is and the grounds upon which it rests.’” Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93

27

(2007) (quoting Bell Atlantic, 550 U.S. at 555, citations and internal quotations marks omitted).

28

In reviewing a complaint under this standard, the court must accept as true the allegations of the
2

1

complaint in question, Erickson, 551 U.S. at 93, and construe the pleading in the light most

2

favorable to the plaintiff. Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 (1974), overruled on other

3

grounds, Davis v. Scherer, 468 U.S. 183 (1984).

4

The only named defendant in this action is Stefani Joanne Germanotta, aka Lady Gaga.

5

Plaintiff alleges that he and Lady Gaga engaged in a series of “tweets.” Plaintiff alleges that

6

defendant Lady Gaga became unhappy with their communication, and caused plaintiff to be

7

banned from Facebook. Plaintiff is suing defendant Lady Gaga for allegedly causing him to be

8

banned from Facebook.

9

Plaintiff is an inmate incarcerated in Pennsylvania. Plaintiff alleges that defendant Lady

10

Gaga resides in New York. Plaintiff alleges that he has brought this action in California, because

11

this is where his alleged injury occurred.

12

Whether jurisdiction is appropriate in this court is not entirely clear. However, it is clear

13

that plaintiff has not stated a potentially cognizable federal claim. Plaintiff’s claims are legally

14

frivolous and cannot be cured to state potentially cognizable claims. For this reason, the

15

undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed.

16

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

17

1. Plaintiff’s request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

18

2. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. Plaintiff

19

is assessed an initial partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

20

§ 1915(b)(1). All fees shall be collected and paid in accordance with this court’s order to the

21

Mahoney State Correctional Institution filed concurrently herewith

22

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed.

23

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

24

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

25

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

26

with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

27

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that

28

////
3

1

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

2

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: May 17, 2017

4
5
6
7
8

Sapp863.dis

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4