Amezcua v. J.C. Penney Properties, Inc. et al
Filing
13
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/19/17. Initial disclosures shall have been completed by 9/8/2017. All discovery shall be completed by 7/20/2018. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 9/14/2018 , and rebuttal expert disclosures due by 10/12/2018. All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restrainingorders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than 12/21/2018. This matter is REFERRED to VDRP for the convening of a VDRP session to take place in March 2018. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
MARIA AMEZCUA,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. 2:17-cv-0865 KJM EFB
v.
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
J.C. PENNEY PROPERTIES, INC., et al.,
14
ORDER
Defendants.
15
16
An initial scheduling conference was held in this case on August 31, 2017. Mark
17
18
Ketcherside appeared for plaintiff; Taylor Rhoan appeared for defendants.
Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Status Report filed on August 24, 2017, and
19
20
discussed a schedule for the case with counsel at the hearing, the court makes the following
21
orders:
22
I.
SERVICE OF PROCESS
All named defendants have been served and no further service is permitted without
23
24
leave of court, good cause having been shown.
25
II.
26
ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS
No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted without
27
leave of court, good cause having been shown. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); Johnson v. Mammoth
28
Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992).
1
1
III.
JURISDICTION/VENUE
2
Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1). Jurisdiction and venue are
3
not disputed.
4
IV.
5
DISCOVERY
Initial disclosures as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) shall have
6
been completed by September 8, 2017. All discovery shall be completed by July 20, 2018. In
7
this context, “completed” means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all
8
depositions have been taken and any disputes relative to discovery shall have been resolved by
9
appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered, the order has been obeyed.
10
All motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the magistrate judge’s calendar in
11
accordance with the local rules of this court. While the assigned magistrate judge reviews
12
proposed discovery phase protective orders, requests to seal or redact are decided by Judge
13
Mueller as discussed in more detail below. In addition, while the assigned magistrate judge
14
handles discovery motions, the magistrate judge cannot change the schedule set in this order,
15
except that the magistrate judge may modify a discovery cutoff to the extent such modification
16
does not have the effect of requiring a change to the balance of the schedule.
17
V.
18
DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES
All counsel are to designate in writing, file with the court, and serve upon all other
19
parties the name, address, and area of expertise of each expert that they propose to tender at trial
20
not later than September 14, 2018. The designation shall be accompanied by a written report
21
prepared and signed by the witness. The report shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B).
22
By October 12, 2018, any party who previously disclosed expert witnesses may submit a
23
supplemental list of expert witnesses who will express an opinion on a subject covered by an
24
expert designated by an adverse party, if the party supplementing an expert witness designation
25
has not previously retained an expert to testify on that subject. The supplemental designation
26
shall be accompanied by a written report, which shall also comply with the conditions stated
27
above.
28
/////
2
1
Failure of a party to comply with the disclosure schedule as set forth above in all
2
likelihood will preclude that party from calling the expert witness at the time of trial. An expert
3
witness not appearing on the designation will not be permitted to testify unless the party offering
4
the witness demonstrates: (a) that the necessity for the witness could not have been reasonably
5
anticipated at the time the list was proffered; (b) that the court and opposing counsel were
6
promptly notified upon discovery of the witness; and (c) that the witness was promptly made
7
available for deposition.
8
9
For purposes of this scheduling order, an “expert” is any person who may be used
at trial to present evidence under Rules 702, 703 and 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which
10
include both “percipient experts” (persons who, because of their expertise, have rendered expert
11
opinions in the normal course of their work duties or observations pertinent to the issues in the
12
case) and “retained experts” (persons specifically designated by a party to be a testifying expert
13
for the purposes of litigation). A party shall identify whether a disclosed expert is percipient,
14
retained, or both. It will be assumed that a party designating a retained expert has acquired the
15
express permission of the witness to be so listed. Parties designating percipient experts must state
16
in the designation who is responsible for arranging the deposition of such persons.
17
All experts designated are to be fully prepared at the time of designation to render
18
an informed opinion, and give the bases for their opinion, so that they will be able to give full and
19
complete testimony at any deposition taken by the opposing party. Experts will not be permitted
20
to testify at trial as to any information gathered or evaluated, or opinion formed, after deposition
21
taken subsequent to designation. All expert discovery shall be completed by November 16,
22
2018.
23
VI.
MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE
24
All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining
25
orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than December 21, 2018.1 The
26
/////
27
28
1
Note that this date may not correspond to a law and motion calendar date.
3
1
parties may obtain available hearing dates by checking Judge Mueller’s page on the court’s
2
website.
3
4
All purely legal issues are to be resolved by timely pretrial motions. Local Rule
230 governs the calendaring and procedures of civil motions; the following provisions also apply:
5
(a)
The opposition and reply must be filed by 4:00 p.m. on the day due; and
6
(b)
When the last day for filing an opposition brief falls on a legal holiday, the
7
opposition brief shall be filed on the last court day immediately preceding the legal holiday.
8
Failure to comply with Local Rule 230(c), as modified by this order, may be deemed consent to
9
the motion and the court may dispose of the motion summarily. Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651,
10
11
652-53 (9th Cir. 1994).
The court values the importance of training young attorneys. The parties are
12
encouraged to consider assigning oral argument to a young attorney. If a written request for oral
13
argument is filed before a hearing, stating an attorney of four or fewer years out of law school
14
will argue the oral argument, then the court will ordinarily hold the hearing, although the court’s
15
schedule and calendar may require the hearing to be reset. Otherwise, the court may find it
16
appropriate in some actions to submit a motion without oral argument.
17
The court places a page limit of twenty (20) pages on all moving papers, twenty
18
(20) pages on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies. All requests for page limit increases
19
must be made in writing at least fourteen (14) days prior to the filing of the motion.
20
Prior to filing a motion in a case in which the parties are represented by counsel,
21
counsel shall engage in a pre-filing meet and confer to discuss thoroughly the substance of the
22
contemplated motion and any potential resolution. Plaintiff’s counsel should carefully evaluate
23
the defendant’s contentions as to deficiencies in the complaint and in many instances the party
24
considering a motion should agree to any amendment that would cure a curable defect. Counsel
25
should discuss the issues sufficiently so that if a motion of any kind is filed, including for
26
summary judgment, the briefing is directed only to those substantive issues requiring resolution
27
by the court. Counsel should resolve minor procedural or other non-substantive matters during
28
the meet and confer. A notice of motion shall contain a certification by counsel filing the
4
1
motion that meet and confer efforts have been exhausted, with a brief summary of meet and
2
confer efforts.
3
The parties are cautioned that failure to raise a dispositive legal issue that could
4
have been tendered to the court by proper pretrial motion prior to the dispositive motion cut-off
5
date may constitute waiver of such issue.
6
VII.
7
SEALING
No document will be sealed, nor shall a redacted document be filed, without the
8
prior approval of the court. If a document for which sealing or redaction is sought relates to the
9
record on a motion to be decided by Judge Mueller, the request to seal or redact should be
10
directed to her and not the assigned Magistrate Judge. All requests to seal or redact shall be
11
governed by Local Rules 141 (sealing) and 140 (redaction); protective orders covering the
12
discovery phase of litigation shall not govern the filing of sealed or redacted documents on the
13
public docket. The court will only consider requests to seal or redact filed by the proponent of
14
sealing or redaction. If a party plans to make a filing that includes material an opposing party has
15
identified as confidential and potentially subject to sealing, the filing party shall provide the
16
opposing party with sufficient notice in advance of filing to allow for the seeking of an order of
17
sealing or redaction from the court.
18
VIII.
19
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
The parties have expressed interest in a settlement conference after some initial
20
discovery has been completed, and are amenable to a settlement conference convened by a
21
member of the court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution Panel (VDRP). Accordingly, this matter is
22
referred to the court’s ADR Coordinator, Sujean Park, for the convening of a VDRP session to
23
take place in March 2018. A principal with full settlement authority for each party shall appear
24
at the VDRP session.
25
26
27
28
In the event no VDRP panelist is available during the time frame set forth above,
the case will be referred to another judge of this court for settlement.
The parties are reminded to promptly notify the court if they settle this case prior
to the scheduled VDRP conference date.
5
1
IX.
2
FURTHER SCHEDULING
The court will set a Final Pretrial Conference date after the resolution of any
3
dispositive motions, or passage of the dispositive motion cutoff, with a trial date being
4
determined at the pretrial conference. The parties should be prepared to confirm a trial date
5
within 60 to 120 days from the date of the final pretrial conference, and should be available for
6
trial accordingly.
7
X.
8
MODIFICATION OF STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
9
Procedure, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order shall not be modified except by leave of court
10
upon a showing of good cause. Agreement of the parties by stipulation alone does not constitute
11
good cause. Except in extraordinary circumstances, unavailability of witnesses or counsel does
12
not constitute good cause.
13
As noted, the assigned magistrate judge is authorized to modify only the discovery
14
dates shown above to the extent any such modification does not impact the balance of the
15
schedule of the case.
16
XI.
17
18
19
20
OBJECTIONS TO STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
This Status Order will become final without further order of the court unless
objections are filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of service of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: September 19, 2017.
21
22
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?