Jimenez v. USA (2255 - 2:08-CR-00420 WBS)

Filing 1

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/19/2017 ADOPTING 114 Findings and Recommendations as to Ivan Qunitero Jimenez; The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the companion civil case, 2:17-cv-0875 WBS. (Washington, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 Respondent, 13 14 No. 2:08-cr-0420 WBS KJN P No. 2:17-cv-0875 WBS KJN v. ORDER IVAN QUINTERO JIMENEZ, 15 Movant. 16 17 Movant, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a motion to vacate, set aside or 18 correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On September 5, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 114) are adopted in full; 27 28 //// 1 2. Movant’s April 24, 2017 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 1 2 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 105) is denied without prejudice; 3 4 3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253; and 5 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the companion civil case, 2:17-cv-0875 6 WBS. 7 Dated: October 19, 2017 8 9 10 jime0420.801.vac 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?