Ford v. People of the State of California

Filing 6

ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:17-cv-0916 KJN) to Fresno (1:17-cv-0654 JLT) signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/10/2017. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID TYRONE FORD, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:17-cv-0916 KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Respondents. 17 18 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, and is presently housed in Soledad State 19 Prison. He has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, 20 together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In his application, petitioner challenges a 21 conviction issued by the Kern County Superior Court. Kern County is part of the Fresno Division 22 of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d). 23 Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper 24 division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the 25 court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. This court 26 will not rule on petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis. 27 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 1. This court has not ruled on petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis; 1 1 2 3 4 2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and 3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at: United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721 5 6 7 Dated: May 10, 2017 8 9 10 /ford0916.109 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?