Randall v. Sacramento State Prison-Folsom

Filing 8

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/9/2017 ORDERING plaintiff to submit, within 30 days, a properly completed request to proceed ifp or the required fees in the amount of $400.00; and the Clerk shall send plaintiff a new ifp application. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VIRGIL DOUGLAS RANDALL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-0929 CKD P v. ORDER SACRAMENTO STATE PRISON FOLSOM, Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 19 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not, however, filed a properly completed request to proceed in forma 20 pauperis or paid the $350.00 filing fee plus the $50.00 administrative fee.1 See 28 U.S.C. §§ 21 1914(a), 1915(a). Plaintiff will be provided the opportunity to submit a properly completed 22 request to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the applicable fees. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, a properly 25 completed request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or 26 27 28 1 If leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, plaintiff will still be required to pay the filing fee but will be allowed to pay it in installments. Litigants proceeding in forma pauperis are not required to pay the $50.00 administrative fee. 1 1 the required fees in the amount of $400.00; plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result 2 in dismissal; and 3 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In 4 Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner. 5 Dated: May 9, 2017 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 1/mp rand0929.3a 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?