Miccio v. Miranda et al
Filing
30
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/10/2018 GRANTING 29 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to file an opposition to 27 Motion to Dismiss. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARIO MICCIO,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-0932 KJM CKD P
v.
ORDER
MIRANDA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff has filed a document the court construes as a motion for an extension of time to
17
18
file an opposition to the pending motion to dismiss. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY
19
ORDERED that:
20
1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 29) is granted; and
21
2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file an opposition
22
to the pending motion to dismiss. Failure to file an opposition within 30 days will result in a
23
recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
24
Dated: July 10, 2018
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
27
1/bh
micc0932.36
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?