Miccio v. Miranda et al
Filing
39
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 03/18/19 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARIO MICCIO,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-0932 KJM CKD P
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
MIRANDA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
By order filed January 30, 2019, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed and thirty
17
18
days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now
19
expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint.
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See
20
21
Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
22
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
23
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after
24
being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with
25
the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and
26
Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir.
2
1991).
3
Dated: March 18, 2019
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
micc0932.fta
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?