Raabe v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al
Filing
5
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/13/2017 GRANTING 4 Motion to Stay pending the resolution of Wells v. Samsung. All deadlines and hearings are VACATED until further order of the court. CASE STAYED. (Donati, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 LINDA L. RAABE, on Behalf of
12 Herself and All Others Similarly
13
Situated,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
vs.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS, INC.,
17 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,
18 LTD, THE HOME DEPOT, INC.,
LOWE’S HOME CENTERS, LLC.,
19 BEST BUY CO., INC., SEARS
Case No.: 2:17−CV−00946−KJM−EFB
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED
MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
(with modifications)
DATE:
TIME:
CRTRM:
July 14, 2017
10:00 a.m.
3/15th Floor
Complaint Filed: May 4, 2017
The Honorable Kimberly J. Mueller
20 HOLDING CORPORATION,
21
Defendants.
22
23
Good cause appearing, Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Stay Proceedings in
24 the above caption action is GRANTED as follows:
25
1.
The action is STAYED pending the resolution of Wells v. Samsung
26 Electronics America, Inc., et al, Case No. CIV-17-46-D and Higginbotham v.
27 Samsung Electronics America, Inc., et al, Case No. CIV-17-102-D (consolidated case
28 number Case No. CIV-17-46-D);
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
1
2.
All deadlines, including Defendants’ obligations to respond to Plaintiff’s
2 complaint, are VACATED until further order of the Court;
3
3.
Plaintiff shall notify the Court of any resolution of Wells v. Samsung
4 Electronics America, Inc., et al, Case No. CIV-17-46-D and Higginbotham v.
5 Samsung Electronics America, Inc., et al, Case No. CIV-17-102-D (consolidated case
6 number Case No. CIV-17-46-D) within fourteen (14) days of the resolution.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 Dated: July 13, 2017.
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?