Bell v. City of Vallejo et al

Filing 12

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/4/2017 RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KENNETH M. BELL,

12
13
14

No. 2: 17-cv-0949 GEB KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

CITY OF VALLEJO, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

By order filed August 28, 2017, plaintiff was granted thirty days to either file an amended

18

complaint or return the forms necessary for service. Thirty days passed and plaintiff failed to file

19

an amended complaint or the forms necessary for service, or otherwise respond to the August 28,

20

2017 order.

21
22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

23

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

24

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

25

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

26

with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

27

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that

28

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District
1

1

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

2

Dated: October 4, 2017

3
4
5
6
Bell949.fta

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2