Thornberry v. Kernan et al

Filing 33

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 08/22/18 ORDERING Plaintiffs motions for appointment of experts 26 , 27 aredenied. Plaintiffs motions for leave to take depositions by written questions 31 , 32 are denied as unnecessary. The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward to plaintiff ten blank subpoena forms. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL LEE THORNBERRY, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, vs. ORDER J. BAL, et al., Defendants. 16 17 No. 2:17-CV-0953-TLN-CMK-P / Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are the following: (1) plaintiff’s motions for 19 appointment of expert witnesses (Docs. 26 and 27); (2) plaintiff’s request for issuance of 20 subpoena forms (Doc. 29); and (3) plaintiff’s motions for leave to take depositions by written 21 questions (Docs. 31 and 32). 22 Plaintiff seeks a court order appointing an “independent neurologist or other 23 neuroscientist” pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35. Rule 35, however, does not 24 provide for court appointment of experts. Instead, that rule allows the court to order a party to 25 submit to a physical or mental examination. Because plaintiff has not cited any authority for the 26 court to appoint experts, plaintiff’s motions will be denied. 1 1 Plaintiff also seeks a court order permitting him to take written depositions 2 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 31(a)(2). Leave of court under this rule is required 3 where the proposed deponent is in custody. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 31(a)(2)(B). In this case, while 4 plaintiff is in custody, the proposed deponents are not. Therefore, leave of court is not required 5 and plaintiff’s motions will be denied as unnecessary. 6 7 Finally, plaintiff requests that the Clerk of the Court issue blank subpoena forms. Good cause appearing therefore, this request will be granted. 8 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 9 1. Plaintiff’s motions for appointment of experts (Docs. 26 and 27) are 2. Plaintiff’s motions for leave to take depositions by written questions 10 11 12 denied; (Docs. 31 and 32) are denied as unnecessary; and 13 3. 14 The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward to plaintiff ten (10) blank subpoena forms. 15 16 17 18 DATED: August 22, 2018 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?