Weaver v. California State Prison Folsom
Filing
4
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/13/2017 ORDERING Clerk of Court to assign a District Judge to this case and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WILLIE WEAVER,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 2:17-cv-0957 CKD P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER AND
CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON
FOLSOM, et al.,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendants.
17
On May 22, 2017, the court ordered that plaintiff pay the $400 filing fee for this action
18
within 14 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to pay the filing fee within 14 days would result
19
in dismissal. Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee.
20
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district
21
court judge to this case; and
22
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
23
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
24
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
25
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
26
27
with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings
and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified
28
1
1
time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153
2
(9th Cir. 1991).
3
Dated: June 13, 2017
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
weav0957.fnrs
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?