Reyes v. Young et al

Filing 15

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 09/13/17 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DAVID REYES,

12
13
14
15

No. 2: 17-cv-0966 GEB KJN P
Plaintiff,

v.

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

A. YOUNG, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

On June 22, 2017, the undersigned granted plaintiff a thirty days extension of time to file

18

an amended complaint. (ECF No. 14.) On July 5, 2017, this order was returned unserved

19

because plaintiff was “out to medical.” On July 18, 2017, the Clerk of the Court re-reserved the

20

June 22, 2017 order on plaintiff.

21
22
23
24

Thirty days have passed since July 18, 2017, and plaintiff has not filed an amended
complaint or otherwise responded to the June 22, 2017 order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

25

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

26

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

27

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

28

with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
1

1

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that

2

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

3

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

4

Dated: September 13, 2017

5
6
7
Rey966.fta

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2