Mehmood v. Sarani
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/26/2017 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made by Yasir Mehmood; Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28:1915(b)(1); all fees shall be collected and paid in accordance with this court's order to the Sheriff of Sacramento County; Service is appropriate for defendant: Tabassum Sarani; the Clerk of the Cour t shall send plaintiff one USM-285 form, one summons, a copy of the complaint filed 8/28/2017 8 , and an instruction sheet; within 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission of Documents, and submit the following documents to the court.(Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
YASIR MEHMOOD,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:17-CV-0970 KJM AC PS
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
TABASSUM SARANI,
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis. Although plaintiff is
18
presently incarcerated, this action does not challenge his conditions of confinement. This
19
proceeding was accordingly referred to this court by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21).
20
On August 16, 2017, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint at the screening stage, but
21
granted leave to amend. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff has now filed his first amended complaint
22
(“Complaint”). ECF No. 8.
23
24
I. SCREENING STANDARDS
The federal IFP statute requires federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally
25
“frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks
26
monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
27
Plaintiff must assist the court in determining whether or not the complaint is frivolous, by drafting
28
the complaint so that it complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ. P.”).
1
1
Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the complaint must contain (1) a “short and plain
2
statement” of the basis for federal jurisdiction (that is, the reason the case is filed in this court,
3
rather than in a state court), (2) a short and plain statement showing that plaintiff is entitled to
4
relief (that is, who harmed the plaintiff, and in what way), and (3) a demand for the relief sought.
5
Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Plaintiff’s claims must be set forth simply, concisely and directly. Fed. R.
6
Civ. P. 8(d)(1).
7
A claim is legally frivolous when it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.
8
Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). In reviewing a complaint under this standard, the
9
court will (1) accept as true all of the factual allegations contained in the complaint, unless they
10
are clearly baseless or fanciful, (2) construe those allegations in the light most favorable to the
11
plaintiff, and (3) resolve all doubts in the plaintiff’s favor. See Neitzke, 490 U.S. at 327; Von
12
Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art at Pasadena, 592 F.3d 954, 960 (9th Cir. 2010), cert.
13
denied, 564 U.S. 1037 (2011).
14
The court applies the same rules of construction in determining whether the complaint
15
states a claim on which relief can be granted. Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (court
16
must accept the allegations as true); Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 (1974) (court must
17
construe the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff). Pro se pleadings are held to a
18
less stringent standard than those drafted by lawyers. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520
19
(1972). However, the court need not accept as true conclusory allegations, unreasonable
20
inferences, or unwarranted deductions of fact. Western Mining Council v. Watt, 643 F.2d 618,
21
624 (9th Cir. 1981). A formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action does not suffice
22
to state a claim. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555-57 (2007); Ashcroft v. Iqbal,
23
556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). To state a claim on which relief may be granted, the plaintiff must
24
allege enough facts “to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Twombly, 550 U.S. at
25
570. “A claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the
26
court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.”
27
Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678.
28
////
2
1
A pro se litigant is entitled to notice of the deficiencies in the complaint and an
2
opportunity to amend, unless the complaint’s deficiencies could not be cured by amendment. See
3
Noll v. Carlson, 809 F.2d 1446, 1448 (9th Cir. 1987).
4
II. THE COMPLAINT
5
The complaint is brought under the Immigration and Naturalization Act, 8 U.S.C. §
6
1183a. ECF No. 8 at 8. This statute is asserted as the basis for federal question jurisdiction. Id.
7
The complaint alleges a breach of the “I-864 Affidavit of Support.” Id. at 10. Plaintiff alleges
8
that defendant “did not honor [her] financial obligation as per i-864 affidavit from 8/17/2009 thru
9
9/21/2010,” “4/3/2012 thru 2/28/2013,” and “3/1/2013 until 8/21/2017.” Id. For screening
10
purposes, the complaint appears to state a cognizable claim against defendant for relief under 8
11
U.S.C. § 1183a(a)(1)(B). 1 If the allegations of the complaint are proven, plaintiff has a
12
reasonable opportunity to prevail on the merits of this action.
13
III. CONCLUSION
14
For the reasons set forth above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
15
1. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. Plaintiff
16
is assessed an initial partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.
17
§ 1915(b)(1). All fees shall be collected and paid in accordance with this court’s order to the
18
Sheriff of Sacramento County filed concurrently herewith.
19
2. Service is appropriate for the following defendant: Tabassum Sarani.
20
3. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff one USM-285 form for each defendant, one
21
summons, a copy of the complaint filed August 28, 2017 (ECF No. 8), and an instruction sheet.
22
4. Within 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice
23
of Submission of Documents, and submit the following documents to the court, for each
24
defendant listed in number 3, above:
25
1
26
27
28
An affidavit of support filed on behalf of an immigrant pursuant to the statute is enforceable as
a contract. 8 U.S.C. § 1183a(a)(1)(B). Section 1183a creates a private right of action by which a
sponsored immigrant may enforce an affidavit of support. 8 U.S.C. § 1183a(e) (“An action to
enforce an affidavit of support . . . may be brought against the sponsor in any appropriate court by
a sponsored alien, with respect to financial support.”).
3
1
a. The completed Notice of Submission of Documents;
2
b. One completed USM-285 form;
3
c. One completed summons; and
4
d. One copy of the endorsed complaint.
5
5. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendant and need not request waiver of service.
6
Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States Marshal to
7
serve the above-named defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment
8
of costs.
9
10
6. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be
dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with a court order.
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
DATED: September 26, 2017
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
YASIR MEHMOOD,
12
13
14
No. 2:17-CV-0970 KJM AC PS
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
TABASSUM SARANI,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
Plaintiff submits the following documents in compliance with the court's order filed
_____________________:
19
____
completed summons forms
20
____
completed USM-285 forms
21
____
copies of the complaint
22
____
consent forms
23
____
copy of service order
24
25
26
____________________________________
Date
____________________________________
Plaintiff
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?