Mehmood v. Sarani

Filing 13

AMENDED 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/27/17 ORDERING that Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. All fees shall be collected and paid in accordance with this court's order to the Warden of the Glades County Detention Center filed concurrently herewith; Service is appropriate for defendant: Tabassum Sarani; the Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff one USM-285 form, one summons, a copy of the complaint filed 8/28/2017 8, and an instruction sheet; within 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission of Documents, and submit the following documents to the court. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 YASIR MEHMOOD, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-0970 KJM AC PS Plaintiff, v. AMENDED ORDER TABASSUM SARANI, Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis. Although plaintiff is 18 presently incarcerated, this action does not challenge his conditions of confinement. This 19 proceeding was accordingly referred to this court by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). 20 On August 16, 2017, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint at the screening stage, but 21 granted him leave to amend. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff has now filed his first amended complaint 22 (“Complaint”). ECF No. 8. 23 24 I. SCREENING STANDARDS The federal IFP statute requires federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally 25 “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks 26 monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). 27 Plaintiff must assist the court in determining whether or not the complaint is frivolous, by drafting 28 the complaint so that it complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ. P.”). 1 1 Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the complaint must contain (1) a “short and plain 2 statement” of the basis for federal jurisdiction (that is, the reason the case is filed in this court, 3 rather than in a state court), (2) a short and plain statement showing that plaintiff is entitled to 4 relief (that is, who harmed the plaintiff, and in what way), and (3) a demand for the relief sought. 5 Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Plaintiff’s claims must be set forth simply, concisely and directly. Fed. R. 6 Civ. P. 8(d)(1). 7 A claim is legally frivolous when it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact. 8 Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). In reviewing a complaint under this standard, the 9 court will (1) accept as true all of the factual allegations contained in the complaint, unless they 10 are clearly baseless or fanciful, (2) construe those allegations in the light most favorable to the 11 plaintiff, and (3) resolve all doubts in the plaintiff’s favor. See Neitzke, 490 U.S. at 327; Von 12 Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art at Pasadena, 592 F.3d 954, 960 (9th Cir. 2010), cert. 13 denied, 564 U.S. 1037 (2011). 14 The court applies the same rules of construction in determining whether the complaint 15 states a claim on which relief can be granted. Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (court 16 must accept the allegations as true); Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 (1974) (court must 17 construe the complaint in the light most favorable to the plaintiff). Pro se pleadings are held to a 18 less stringent standard than those drafted by lawyers. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 19 (1972). However, the court need not accept as true conclusory allegations, unreasonable 20 inferences, or unwarranted deductions of fact. Western Mining Council v. Watt, 643 F.2d 618, 21 624 (9th Cir. 1981). A formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action does not suffice 22 to state a claim. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555-57 (2007); Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 23 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). To state a claim on which relief may be granted, the plaintiff must 24 allege enough facts “to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Twombly, 550 U.S. at 25 570. “A claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the 26 court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” 27 Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678. 28 A pro se litigant is entitled to notice of the deficiencies in the complaint and an 2 1 opportunity to amend, unless the complaint’s deficiencies could not be cured by amendment. See 2 Noll v. Carlson, 809 F.2d 1446, 1448 (9th Cir. 1987). 3 II. THE COMPLAINT 4 The complaint is brought under the Immigration and Naturalization Act, 8 U.S.C. § 5 1183a. ECF No. 8 at 8. This statute is asserted as the basis for federal question jurisdiction. Id. 6 The complaint alleges a breach of the “I-864 Affidavit of Support.” Id. at 10. Plaintiff alleges 7 that defendant “did not honor [her] financial obligation as per i-864 affidavit from 8/17/2009 thru 8 9/21/2010,” “4/3/2012 thru 2/28/2013,” and “3/1/2013 until 8/21/2017.” Id. For screening 9 purposes, the complaint appears to state a cognizable claim against defendant for relief under 8 10 U.S.C. § 1183a(a)(1)(B).1 If the allegations of the complaint are proven, plaintiff has a 11 reasonable opportunity to prevail on the merits of this action. 12 III. CONCLUSION 13 For the reasons set forth above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 14 1. Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. Plaintiff 15 is assessed an initial partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 16 § 1915(b)(1). All fees shall be collected and paid in accordance with this court’s order to the 17 Warden of the Glades County Detention Center filed concurrently herewith. 18 2. Service is appropriate for the following defendant: Tabassum Sarani. 19 3. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff one USM-285 form for each defendant, one 20 summons, a copy of the complaint filed August 28, 2017 (ECF No. 8), and an instruction sheet. 21 4. Within 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice 22 of Submission of Documents, and submit the following documents to the court, for each 23 defendant listed in number 3, above: 24 a. The completed Notice of Submission of Documents; 25 1 26 27 28 An affidavit of support filed on behalf of an immigrant pursuant to the statute is enforceable as a contract. 8 U.S.C. § 1183a(a)(1)(B). Section 1183a creates a private right of action by which a sponsored immigrant may enforce an affidavit of support. 8 U.S.C. § 1183a(e) (“An action to enforce an affidavit of support . . . may be brought against the sponsor in any appropriate court by a sponsored alien, with respect to financial support.”). 3 1 b. One completed USM-285 form; 2 c. One completed summons; and 3 d. One copy of the endorsed complaint. 4 5. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendant and need not request waiver of service. 5 Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States Marshal to 6 serve the above-named defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment 7 of costs. 8 9 6. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with a court order. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 DATED: September 27, 2017 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 YASIR MEHMOOD, 12 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-0970 KJM AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER TABASSUM SARANI, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff submits the following documents in compliance with the court's order filed _____________________: 19 ____ completed summons forms 20 ____ completed USM-285 forms 21 ____ copies of the complaint 22 ____ consent forms 23 ____ copy of service order 24 25 26 27 ____________________________________ Date ____________________________________ Plaintiff 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?