Little v. AMCO Insurance Company

Filing 9

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/11/17: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 8/28/2018. Discovery due by 8/6/2018. Dispositive Motions shall be heard no later than 12/7/2018. A mid-litigation conference is set for 6/21/2018 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

CHAD LITTLE,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

No. 2:17-cv-0975 KJM KJN

v.

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

AMCO INSURANCE COMPANY,

14

ORDER

Defendant.

15
16
An initial scheduling conference was held in this case on September 28, 2017.

17
18

Kathleen Herdell appeared for plaintiff; Sonia Martin appeared for defendant.
Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Status Report filed on September 20, 2017, and

19
20

discussed a schedule for the case with counsel at the hearing, the court makes the following

21

orders:

22

I.

SERVICE OF PROCESS
All named defendants have been served and no further service is permitted without

23
24

leave of court, good cause having been shown.

25

II.

26

ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS
No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted without

27

leave of court, good cause having been shown. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); Johnson v. Mammoth

28

Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992).
1

1

III.

JURISDICTION/VENUE

2

Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). Jurisdiction and venue are not

3

disputed.

4

IV.

5

DISCOVERY
Initial disclosures as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) shall be

6

completed within fourteen (14) days of the scheduling conference. All discovery shall be

7

completed by August 6, 2018. In this context, “completed” means that all discovery shall have

8

been conducted so that all depositions have been taken and any disputes relative to discovery

9

shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, where discovery has been ordered,

10

the order has been obeyed. All motions to compel discovery must be noticed on the magistrate

11

judge’s calendar in accordance with the local rules of this court. While the assigned magistrate

12

judge reviews proposed discovery phase protective orders, requests to seal or redact are decided

13

by Judge Mueller as discussed in more detail below. In addition, while the assigned magistrate

14

judge handles discovery motions, the magistrate judge cannot change the schedule set in this

15

order, except that the magistrate judge may modify a discovery cutoff to the extent such

16

modification does not have the effect of requiring a change to the balance of the schedule.

17

The parties believe certain confidential records may require privacy protections.

18

The parties shall file a proposed joint discovery protective order within fourteen (14) days of the

19

scheduling conference.

20

V.

MID-LITIGATION CONFERENCE

21

A mid-litigation conference is set for June 21, 2018 at 2:30 p.m. The parties shall

22

submit a joint statement at least seven (7) days prior to the conference outlining what they believe

23

the court needs to know at that time.

24

VI.

25

DISCLOSURE OF EXPERT WITNESSES
All counsel are to designate in writing, file with the court, and serve upon all other

26

parties the name, address, and area of expertise of each expert that they propose to tender at trial

27

not later than August 28, 2018. The designation shall be accompanied by a written report

28

prepared and signed by the witness. The report shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B).
2

1

By September 14, 2018, any party who previously disclosed expert witnesses may submit a

2

supplemental list of expert witnesses who will express an opinion on a subject covered by an

3

expert designated by an adverse party, if the party supplementing an expert witness designation

4

has not previously retained an expert to testify on that subject. The supplemental designation

5

shall be accompanied by a written report, which shall also comply with the conditions stated

6

above.

7

Failure of a party to comply with the disclosure schedule as set forth above in all

8

likelihood will preclude that party from calling the expert witness at the time of trial. An expert

9

witness not appearing on the designation will not be permitted to testify unless the party offering

10

the witness demonstrates: (a) that the necessity for the witness could not have been reasonably

11

anticipated at the time the list was proffered; (b) that the court and opposing counsel were

12

promptly notified upon discovery of the witness; and (c) that the witness was promptly made

13

available for deposition.

14

For purposes of this scheduling order, an “expert” is any person who may be used

15

at trial to present evidence under Rules 702, 703 and 705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which

16

include both “percipient experts” (persons who, because of their expertise, have rendered expert

17

opinions in the normal course of their work duties or observations pertinent to the issues in the

18

case) and “retained experts” (persons specifically designated by a party to be a testifying expert

19

for the purposes of litigation). A party shall identify whether a disclosed expert is percipient,

20

retained, or both. It will be assumed that a party designating a retained expert has acquired the

21

express permission of the witness to be so listed. Parties designating percipient experts must state

22

in the designation who is responsible for arranging the deposition of such persons.

23

All experts designated are to be fully prepared at the time of designation to render

24

an informed opinion, and give the bases for their opinion, so that they will be able to give full and

25

complete testimony at any deposition taken by the opposing party. Experts will not be permitted

26

to testify at trial as to any information gathered or evaluated, or opinion formed, after deposition

27

taken subsequent to designation. All expert discovery shall be completed by November 2, 2018.

28

/////
3

1

VII.

MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE

2

All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining

3

orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than December 7, 2018.1 The

4

parties may obtain available hearing dates by checking Judge Mueller’s page on the court’s

5

website.

6
7

All purely legal issues are to be resolved by timely pretrial motions. Local Rule
230 governs the calendaring and procedures of civil motions; the following provisions also apply:

8

(a)

The opposition and reply must be filed by 4:00 p.m. on the day due; and

9

(b)

When the last day for filing an opposition brief falls on a legal holiday, the

10

opposition brief shall be filed on the last court day immediately preceding the legal holiday.

11

Failure to comply with Local Rule 230(c), as modified by this order, may be deemed consent to

12

the motion and the court may dispose of the motion summarily. Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651,

13

652-53 (9th Cir. 1994).

14

The court values the importance of training young attorneys. The parties are

15

encouraged to consider assigning oral argument to a young attorney. If a written request for oral

16

argument is filed before a hearing, stating an attorney of four or fewer years out of law school

17

will argue the oral argument, then the court will ordinarily hold the hearing, although the court’s

18

schedule and calendar may require the hearing to be reset. Otherwise, the court may find it

19

appropriate in some actions to submit a motion without oral argument.

20

The court places a page limit of twenty (20) pages on all moving papers, twenty

21

(20) pages on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies. All requests for page limit increases

22

must be made in writing at least fourteen (14) days prior to the filing of the motion.

23

Prior to filing a motion in a case in which the parties are represented by counsel,

24

counsel shall engage in a pre-filing meet and confer to discuss thoroughly the substance of the

25

contemplated motion and any potential resolution. Plaintiff’s counsel should carefully evaluate

26

the defendant’s contentions as to deficiencies in the complaint and in many instances the party

27
28

1

Note that this date may not correspond to a law and motion calendar date.
4

1

considering a motion should agree to any amendment that would cure a curable defect. Counsel

2

should discuss the issues sufficiently so that if a motion of any kind is filed, including for

3

summary judgment, the briefing is directed only to those substantive issues requiring resolution

4

by the court. Counsel should resolve minor procedural or other non-substantive matters during

5

the meet and confer. A notice of motion shall contain a certification by counsel filing the

6

motion that meet and confer efforts have been exhausted, with a brief summary of meet and

7

confer efforts.

8
9

The parties are cautioned that failure to raise a dispositive legal issue that could
have been tendered to the court by proper pretrial motion prior to the dispositive motion cut-off

10

date may constitute waiver of such issue.

11

VIII.

12

SEALING
No document will be sealed, nor shall a redacted document be filed, without the

13

prior approval of the court. If a document for which sealing or redaction is sought relates to the

14

record on a motion to be decided by Judge Mueller, the request to seal or redact should be

15

directed to her and not the assigned Magistrate Judge. All requests to seal or redact shall be

16

governed by Local Rules 141 (sealing) and 140 (redaction); protective orders covering the

17

discovery phase of litigation shall not govern the filing of sealed or redacted documents on the

18

public docket. The court will only consider requests to seal or redact filed by the proponent of

19

sealing or redaction. If a party plans to make a filing that includes material an opposing party has

20

identified as confidential and potentially subject to sealing, the filing party shall provide the

21

opposing party with sufficient notice in advance of filing to allow for the seeking of an order of

22

sealing or redaction from the court.

23

IX.

24

FURTHER SCHEDULING
The court will set a Final Pretrial Conference date after the resolution of any

25

dispositive motions, or passage of the dispositive motion cutoff, with a trial date being

26

determined at the pretrial conference. The parties should be prepared to confirm a trial date

27

within 60 to 120 days from the date of the final pretrial conference, and should be available for

28

trial accordingly.
5

1

X.

2
3

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
The parties shall participate in private mediation and shall have exhausted private

settlement efforts by June 21, 2017.

4

A court convened settlement conference may be set at the time of the Mid-

5

Litigation Conference, the Final Pretrial Conference or at an earlier time at the parties’ request.

6

In the event that an earlier court settlement conference date or referral to the Voluntary Dispute

7

Resolution Program (VDRP) is requested, the parties shall file said request jointly, in writing.

8

Counsel are instructed to have a principal with full settlement authority present at

9

any Settlement Conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms. Each judge

10

has different requirements for the submission of settlement conference statements; the appropriate

11

instructions will be sent to you after the settlement judge is assigned.

12

XI.

13

MODIFICATION OF STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil

14

Procedure, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order shall not be modified except by leave of court

15

upon a showing of good cause. Agreement of the parties by stipulation alone does not constitute

16

good cause. Except in extraordinary circumstances, unavailability of witnesses or counsel does

17

not constitute good cause.

18

As noted, the assigned magistrate judge is authorized to modify only the discovery

19

dates shown above to the extent any such modification does not impact the balance of the

20

schedule of the case.

21

XII.

22
23
24
25

OBJECTIONS TO STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER
This Status Order will become final without further order of the court unless

objections are filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of service of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 11, 2017.

26
27

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

28
6