Lee v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, et al.

Filing 17

ORDER RE STIPULATION regarding standard review signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/21/17. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court has accepted the Parties' stipulation and will employ the de novo standard of review in this case. IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that no discovery will be conducted by the Parties in this case. This Order regarding the appropriate standard of review is specifically limited to the facts and circumstances of this particular case.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SARAH R. LEE, an individual, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE ) COMPANY OF AMERICA, a New ) Jersey corporation in its capacities as a fiduciary and claims administrator of the ) ) ERISA-regulated WINROCK ) INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ) AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN and ) ) the WINROCK INTERNATIONAL ) INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL ) DEVELOPMENT LONG-TERM ) DISABILITY PLAN, ) ) Defendants. ) Case No. 2:17-cv-00978-MCE-CMK ORDER RE STIPULATION REGARDING STANDARD OF REVIEW Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England 1 Based upon the Parties’ Stipulation regarding the Standard of Review and 2 finding good cause therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court has 3 accepted the Parties’ stipulation and will employ the de novo standard of review in 4 this case. IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that no discovery will be 5 conducted by the Parties in this case. This Order regarding the appropriate standard 6 of review is specifically limited to the facts and circumstances of this particular case. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: August 21, 2017 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No. 2:17-cv-00978-MCE-CMK ORDER RE STIPULATION REGARDING STANDARD OF REVIEW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?