Scales v. Agwara et al
Filing
14
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/7/2018 ORDERING Clerk of Court to randomly assign a U.S. District Judge to this action and RECOMMENDING plaintiff's claims against defendants Villanueva and Ferruolo be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RANDY A. SCALES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-1004-EFB P
v.
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
P. AGWARA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42
17
18
U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed May 3, 2018, the court found that plaintiff had stated a potentially
19
cognizable claim for Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs against
20
defendants Buckner, Frangos, and Agwara. ECF No. 8. The court informed plaintiff he could
21
proceed as to those defendants only or file an amended complaint within 30 days to cure the
22
defects in his remaining claims, including the claims against defendants Villanueva and Ferruolo.
23
Id. The time for amending has passed and plaintiff has elected to proceed only with the claim
24
against defendants Buckner, Frangos, and Agwara. See ECF No. 11.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall randomly
25
26
assign a United States District Judge to this action.
27
/////
28
/////
1
2
Further, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s claims against defendants
Villanueva and Ferruolo be dismissed without prejudice.
3
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
4
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
5
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
6
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
7
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections
8
within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.
9
Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
10
Dated: June 7, 2018.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?