Zumpano v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 22

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 2/26/2018 ORDERING that Teresa Victoria Zumpano be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $6,000.00 under the EAJA. (Hunt, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration Margaret Branick-Abilla, CSBN 223600 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8929 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Margaret.Branick-Abilla@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TERESA VICTORIA ZUMPANO, vs. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 16 17 Defendant. Case No.: 2:17-cv-01006-CMK STIPULATION & ORDER FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) 18 19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned 20 counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff Teresa Victoria Zumpano (Plaintiff) 21 be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of six thousand dollars and zero cents 22 ($6,000.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). This amount 23 represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in 24 connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d). 25 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider 26 the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel Josephine Gerrard. Pursuant to 27 Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on 28 whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Stipulation & PO; Case No.: 2:17-cv-01006-CMK 1 1 Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will 2 determine whether they are subject to any offset. 3 Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines 4 that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees 5 and expenses to be made directly to counsel Josephine Gerrard, pursuant to the assignment 6 executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to counsel Josephine Gerrard. 7 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA 8 attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the 9 EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and 10 bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or counsel Josephine Gerrard including Gerrard Law 11 Offices may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action. 12 This award is without prejudice to the rights of counsel Josephine Gerrard and/or Gerrard 13 Law Offices to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the 14 savings clause provisions of the EAJA. 15 Respectfully submitted, 16 17 Dated: February 20, 2018 18 GERRARD LAW OFFICES By:/s/ Josephine M. Gerrard* JOSEPHINE M. GERRARD Attorneys for Plaintiff [*As authorized by e-mail on Feb. 20, 2018] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Dated: February 26, 2018 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration By: /s/ Margaret Branick-Abilla ___ MARGARET BRANICK-ABILLA Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 28 Stipulation & PO; Case No.: 2:17-cv-01006-CMK 2 1 ORDER 2 3 Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 Dated: February 26, 2018 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation & PO; Case No.: 2:17-cv-01006-CMK 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?