Zumpano v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
22
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 2/26/2018 ORDERING that Teresa Victoria Zumpano be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $6,000.00 under the EAJA. (Hunt, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
MCGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
Margaret Branick-Abilla, CSBN 223600
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8929
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: Margaret.Branick-Abilla@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
TERESA VICTORIA ZUMPANO,
vs.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
16
17
Defendant.
Case No.: 2:17-cv-01006-CMK
STIPULATION & ORDER FOR THE
AWARD AND PAYMENT OF
ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES
PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS
TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)
18
19
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned
20
counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff Teresa Victoria Zumpano (Plaintiff)
21
be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of six thousand dollars and zero cents
22
($6,000.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). This amount
23
represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in
24
connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d).
25
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider
26
the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel Josephine Gerrard. Pursuant to
27
Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on
28
whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the
Stipulation & PO; Case No.: 2:17-cv-01006-CMK
1
1
Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will
2
determine whether they are subject to any offset.
3
Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines
4
that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees
5
and expenses to be made directly to counsel Josephine Gerrard, pursuant to the assignment
6
executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to counsel Josephine Gerrard.
7
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA
8
attorney fees, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the
9
EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and
10
bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or counsel Josephine Gerrard including Gerrard Law
11
Offices may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.
12
This award is without prejudice to the rights of counsel Josephine Gerrard and/or Gerrard
13
Law Offices to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the
14
savings clause provisions of the EAJA.
15
Respectfully submitted,
16
17
Dated: February 20, 2018
18
GERRARD LAW OFFICES
By:/s/ Josephine M. Gerrard*
JOSEPHINE M. GERRARD
Attorneys for Plaintiff
[*As authorized by e-mail on Feb. 20, 2018]
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dated: February 26, 2018
MCGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
By: /s/ Margaret Branick-Abilla
___
MARGARET BRANICK-ABILLA
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
28
Stipulation & PO; Case No.: 2:17-cv-01006-CMK
2
1
ORDER
2
3
Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
6
Dated: February 26, 2018
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation & PO; Case No.: 2:17-cv-01006-CMK
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?