Roush et al v. MSI Inventory Service Corporation et al

Filing 25

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/10/18 VACATING the 9 Scheduling Order pending the Parties' settlement discussions; the Parties will file a Joint Status Report by 03/11/19, regarding the status of settlement discussions and a proposed amendment to the scheduling order. (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
ROSE LAW, APC
11335 GOLD EXPRESS DRIVE, SUITE 135
GOLD RIVER, CALIFORNIA 95670

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Joseph W. Rose, State Bar No. 232261
[e-mail]
Mehran Tahoori, State Bar No. 283313
[e-mail]
ROSE LAW, APC
11335 Gold Express Drive, Suite 135
Gold River, California 95670
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
KIM ROUSH, SHEILA EMMERLING, and
CINDY HENDERSON, individually and on
behalf of all other similarly situated

Howard A. Sagaser, State Bar No. 72492
Ian B. Wieland, State Bar No. 285721
David G. Litman, State Bar No. 285768
SAGASER, WATKINS & WIELAND, PC
5260 North Palm Avenue, Suite 400
Fresno, CA 93704
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
MSI INVENTORY SERVICE CORPORATION,
I-FRAN, INC. JAMES O’ MCCLAIN, AND
SANDRA B. MCCLAIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
KIM ROUSH, SHEILA EMMERLING, and
CINDY HENDERSON, individually and on
behalf of all other similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,

Case No. 2:17−CV−01010−JAM−KJN
STIPULATED AMENDMENT TO
SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER
ACTION FILED: May 13, 2017
JUDGE: Hon. John A. Mendez

v.
MSI INVENTORY SERVICE CORPORATION,
I-FRAN, INC., JAMES O. MCCLAIN, SANDRA
B. MCCLAIN, and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,
Defendants.

Plaintiffs and Defendants (collectively, the  “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel

of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

24
25

WHEREAS, on January 13, 2018, this Court entered a scheduling order (Dkt 9) providing for a

26

discovery completion deadline of March 15, 2019, an expert disclosure deadline of January 4, 2019, a

27

supplemental expert disclosure deadline of January 31, 2019, among other dates;
///

28

2:17−CV−0101
0−JAM−KJN

STIPULATED AMENDMENT TO SCHEDULING ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
ROSE LAW, APC
11335 GOLD EXPRESS DRIVE, SUITE 135
GOLD RIVER, CALIFORNIA 95670

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to temporarily postpone formal discovery to concentrate
resources on ongoing settlement discussions;
WHEREAS, the Parties are currently engaged in settlement discussions, are scheduled to
participate in private mediation on December 12, 2018, and wish to amend the Court’s scheduling order
to allow additional time for concentrated settlement discussions;
WHEREAS, the Parties agree to report to the Court regarding the status of the matter and
settlement discussions within approximately three months;
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate, subject to the approval of this Court, that:
1.

The January 13, 2018, scheduling order (Dkt 9) is vacated pending the Parties’ settlement

discussions; and
2.

The Parties will file a Joint Status Report on or before March 11, 2019, regarding the

status of settlement discussions and a proposed amendment to the scheduling order.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: December 9, 2018

SAGASER, WATKINS & WIELAND, PC
By:

/s/ Ian B. Wieland as auth. on 12/09/2018
Ian B. Wieland

Attorneys for Defendants
Dated: December 9, 2018

ROSE LAW, A PROF. CORP.
By:

/s/ Joseph W. Rose
Joseph W. Rose

Attorneys for Plaintiff

24

IT IS SO ORDERED

25
26

Dated: 12/10/2018

27

/s/ John A. Mendez____________________
United States District Court Judge

28

2:17−CV−0101
0−JAM−KJN

STIPULATED AMENDMENT TO SCHEDULING ORDER AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

2