Staychock et al v. Klean Kanteen, Inc.

Filing 80

ORDER OF DISMISSAL signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/21/2018 ORDERING, pursuant to the joint request for dismissal, all claims, including all claims in the pending second amended complaint, and counterclaims asserted between the Staychocks and Klean Kanteen in this consolidated action are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party is to bear their own costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Evan S. Nadel (SBN 213230) enadel@mintz.com Philip C. Ducker (SBN 262644) pcducker@mintz.com MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY AND POPEO P.C. 44 Montgomery Street, 36th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415-432-6000 Facsimile: 415-432-6001 Attorney for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff, KLEAN KANTEEN, INC. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 RICHARD STAYCHOCK and KATHLEEN MACKAY STAYCHOCK, Civil Action No. 2:17-cv-01012-KJM-CMK 13 Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants, 14 15 16 17 18 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE v. KLEAN KANTEEN, INC., Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01012-KJM-CMK 1 Having considered Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants Richard Staychock and 2 Kathleen Staychock and Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Klean Kanteen, Inc.’s Joint 3 Request for Dismissal with Prejudice, it is hereby ORDERED that: 4 1. All claims, including all claims in the pending second amended complaint, and 5 counterclaims asserted between the Staychocks and Klean Kanteen in this 6 consolidated action are dismissed WITH PREJUDICE, and 7 2. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Each party is to bear their own costs, attorneys’ fees, and expenses. DATED: August 21, 2018. 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01012-KJM-CMK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?