Staychock et al v. Klean Kanteen, Inc.
Filing
80
ORDER OF DISMISSAL signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/21/2018 ORDERING, pursuant to the joint request for dismissal, all claims, including all claims in the pending second amended complaint, and counterclaims asserted between the Staychocks and Klean Kanteen in this consolidated action are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party is to bear their own costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Evan S. Nadel (SBN 213230)
enadel@mintz.com
Philip C. Ducker (SBN 262644)
pcducker@mintz.com
MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY
AND POPEO P.C.
44 Montgomery Street, 36th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415-432-6000
Facsimile: 415-432-6001
Attorney for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff,
KLEAN KANTEEN, INC.
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
RICHARD STAYCHOCK and KATHLEEN
MACKAY STAYCHOCK,
Civil Action No. 2:17-cv-01012-KJM-CMK
13
Plaintiffs and
Counterclaim Defendants,
14
15
16
17
18
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
v.
KLEAN KANTEEN, INC.,
Defendant and
Counterclaim Plaintiff.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01012-KJM-CMK
1
Having considered Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants Richard Staychock and
2
Kathleen Staychock and Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Klean Kanteen, Inc.’s Joint
3
Request for Dismissal with Prejudice, it is hereby ORDERED that:
4
1.
All claims, including all claims in the pending second amended complaint, and
5
counterclaims asserted between the Staychocks and Klean Kanteen in this
6
consolidated action are dismissed WITH PREJUDICE, and
7
2.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
Each party is to bear their own costs, attorneys’ fees, and expenses.
DATED: August 21, 2018.
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01012-KJM-CMK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?