Penaloza v. Abdur-Rahman et al

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/21/2017 DISMISSING this action without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to comply with a court order. CASE CLOSED. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROBERT PENALOZA,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:17-cv-1015 DB P

v.

ORDER

SALAHUDDIN ABDUR-RAHMAN, et
al.,
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights
18
action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate
19
judge.
20

On June 8, 2017, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend for failure to

21
state a claim. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff was granted thirty days to file an amended complaint. When
22
plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint within that time period, an order to show cause
23
issued as to why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order.
24
(ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff has failed to respond to the order to show cause, and the time for a
25
response has now passed.
26
////
27
////
28
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice

2

for plaintiff’s failure to comply with a court order.

3

Dated: August 21, 2017

4
5
6
7

/DLB7;
DB/Inbox/Routine/pena1015.dism

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2