Tating v. Chase, N.A.
Filing
15
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/29/2017 DISMISSING this case with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
BRYAN CAVE LLP
THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4070
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
12
EILEEN TATING, an individual,
13
14
15
16
17
Case No.: 2:17-cv-01027-JAM-GGH
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE
vs.
CHASE, N.A.; and DOES 1 to 20, inclusive,
Defendants.
Action Filed: December 5, 2014
Trial Date:
None
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
SF01DOCS\308709.1\C080519\0378239
1
Pursuant to the Stipulation for Dismissal of Action With Prejudice agreed to by the
2
Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE, N.A. (erroneously named as CHASE, N.A.) (“Defendant”) and
3
plaintiff EILEEN TATING (“Plaintiff”) (collectively, the “Parties”),
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
5
6
7
1. This Action is dismissed with prejudice.
2. Each Party to bear their own costs and fees.
8
9
Dated: 8/29/2017
/s/ John A. Mendez_______________
Judge of United States District Court
BRYAN CAVE LLP
THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4070
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No. 2:17-cv-01027-JAM-GGH
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
SF01DOCS\308709.1\C080519\0378239
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?