Tating v. Chase, N.A.

Filing 15

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/29/2017 DISMISSING this case with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10
BRYAN CAVE LLP
THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4070

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

12

EILEEN TATING, an individual,

13
14
15
16
17

Case No.: 2:17-cv-01027-JAM-GGH

Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE

vs.
CHASE, N.A.; and DOES 1 to 20, inclusive,
Defendants.

Action Filed: December 5, 2014
Trial Date:
None

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
SF01DOCS\308709.1\C080519\0378239

1

Pursuant to the Stipulation for Dismissal of Action With Prejudice agreed to by the

2

Defendant JPMORGAN CHASE, N.A. (erroneously named as CHASE, N.A.) (“Defendant”) and

3

plaintiff EILEEN TATING (“Plaintiff”) (collectively, the “Parties”),

4

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

5
6
7

1. This Action is dismissed with prejudice.
2. Each Party to bear their own costs and fees.

8
9

Dated: 8/29/2017

/s/ John A. Mendez_______________
Judge of United States District Court

BRYAN CAVE LLP
THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 7TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4070

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

Case No. 2:17-cv-01027-JAM-GGH

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
SF01DOCS\308709.1\C080519\0378239