Hendon v. Stainer, et al.

Filing 7

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/28/2017 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CARLOS HENDON, 12 No. 2:17-cv-1033 KJN P Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 STAINER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On May 30, 2017, plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). By an order filed May 25, 2017, the court found that plaintiff has sustained three strikes 20 under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and therefore, plaintiff was ordered to pay the court’s filing fee within 21 twenty-one days. Plaintiff was also cautioned that failure to pay the fee would result in a 22 recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and 23 plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not paid the appropriate filing fee. 24 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. Dated: June 28, 2017 26 27 /hend1033.fpf 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?