Watkins v. Murphy
Filing
85
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/9/2019 ORDERING: After reviewing the parties' statements, the district judge has directed the undersigned to inform the parties that trial will commence on 4/6/2020, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom No. 6. ORDERING: that on or before 10/4/2019, the parties shall file and serve separate pretrial statements that fully address each of the matters set forth in Local Rule 281(b); no exhibits shall be submitted at this time. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAMES WATKINS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-1041 JAM AC P
v.
ORDER
D. MURPHY,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff James Watkins is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with
18
this civil rights action against sole defendant CDCR Correctional Officer D. Murphy on a claim
19
of excessive force. This case is now proceeding to trial before District Judge John A. Mendez.
20
The parties have filed their respective statements concerning the estimated length of trial (two to
21
three days) and their black-out dates. After reviewing the parties’ statements, the district judge
22
has directed the undersigned to inform the parties that trial will commence on Monday, April 6,
23
2020, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom No. 6.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on or before Friday, October 4, 2019,
24
25
the parties shall file and serve separate pretrial statements that fully address each of the
26
matters set forth in Local Rule 281(b); no exhibits shall be submitted at this time.
27
////
28
////
1
1
SO ORDERED.
2
DATED: July 9, 2019.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?