Turner v. Redding Bank of Commerce

Filing 39

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 10/24/18 ORDERING that plaintiff's counsel shall pay to defendant's counsel reasonable expenses pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5) in the amount of $6,230.00 within 15 days of the date of this order. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JULIE TURNER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-CV-1047-TLN-DMC v. ORDER REDDING BANK OF COMMERCE, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil action. On 18 September 14, 2018, the court granted defendant’s motion to compel and motion for expenses 19 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5) subject to submission of a supplemental 20 declaration from defendant’s counsel as to actual expenses. Defendant’s counsel has submitted a 21 supplemental declaration (Doc. 36) and plaintiff’s counsel has replied (Doc. 37). As outlined in the counsel’s supplemental declaration, defendant seeks an order 22 23 awarding $7,688.00 in attorney’s fees representing 28.4 hours of work at a rate of $270 per hour. 24 Defendant does not seek any costs associated with its motion to compel. Of the claimed 28.4 25 hours, 5.4 hours are claimed relating to time traveling to Sacramento on July 11, 2018, to attend 26 the originally-scheduled hearing. Plaintiff objects to this portion of defendant’s request. 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 Plaintiff’s objection is well-taken. While the court’s local rules require that 2 discovery motions be noticed for hearing before the assigned Magistrate Judge, see E. Dist. Cal. 3 Local Rule 302(c)(1), defendant noticed its motion to compel and motion for expenses for hearing 4 at the courthouse “located at 501 I Street, Sacramento, California. . .,” see Docs. 20 and 21 5 (defendant’s notices of motion), even though the assigned Magistrate Judge in this case is located 6 in Redding, California. Given defendant’s error in noticing its motions for hearing in Sacramento 7 instead of Redding, the expense associated with counsel’s travel to and from Sacramento for a 8 hearing on July 11, 2018, are more reasonably attributable to defendant’s error rather than 9 plaintiff’s conduct necessitating the motion to compel. The amount requested will, therefore, be 10 11 reduced by $1,458.00 (5.4 hours at $270 per hour). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s counsel shall pay to 12 defendant’s counsel reasonable expenses pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5) in the amount of 13 $6,230.00 within 15 days of the date of this order. 14 15 16 Dated: October 24, 2018 ____________________________________ DENNIS M. COTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?