Belyew v. Stapleton

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/3/2017 ORDERING the court takes no action on ECF No. 17 filing, as this case is now closed. Plaintiff is hereby informed that the court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not authorized by the FRCP or FRAP. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

LISA BELYEW,

11
12
13

No. 2:17-cv-1065-EFB P
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

MARK STAPLETON,

14

Defendant.

15
16

Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42

17

U.S.C. § 1983. On May 30, 2017, plaintiff filed a form indicating her consent to the jurisdiction

18

of a magistrate judge. ECF No. 4. On September 8, 2017, the court properly dismissed her

19

complaint by order (as opposed to issuing findings and recommendations), and judgment was

20

entered. See ECF No. 14 (explaining that pursuant to Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971), this

21

court could not interfere with plaintiff’s state court criminal proceedings); ECF No. 16. On

22

September 17, 2017, plaintiff filed a 97-page document titled “objections to magistrates

23

findings.” ECF No. 17. The court takes no action on the filing as this case is now closed.

24

Plaintiff is hereby informed that the court will not respond to future filings in this action that are

25

not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate

26

Procedure.

27
28

So ordered.
Dated: October 3, 2017.