Cho et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
Filing
102
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/20/2018 ORDERING that the 100 Findings and Recommendations are VACATED. No later than 5/10/2018, plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint that complies with the terms of the court's 91 order. Failure to comply with the terms and deadlines of this order will result in a recommendation of dismissal of the action with prejudice. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JUNG HYUN CHO, et al.,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 2:17-cv-01073-KJM-CKD (PS)
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING,
INC., et al.,
Defendants.
17
18
On April 5, 2018, after plaintiffs missed two court-ordered deadlines to file an amended
19
complaint (see ECF Nos. 91, 96), the undersigned recommended dismissal of this matter,
20
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (ECF No. 100.)
21
Then, on April 17, 2018, plaintiffs filed objections to the undersigned’s recommendations.
22
(ECF No. 101.) However, plaintiffs have neither filed an amended complaint nor requested any
23
additional time to do so. Instead, plaintiffs appear to move for reconsideration of the court’s
24
January 17, 2018 order dismissing the complaint with leave to amend. (See ECF No. 101.) To
25
the extent that plaintiffs seek reconsideration, that request is denied as plaintiffs have not
26
demonstrated any relevant change to the law or facts in this matter. Moreover, the court once
27
again advises plaintiffs that this matter was not automatically stayed when plaintiffs filed an
28
interlocutory appeal to the court’s January 17, 2018 order.
1
1
Still, the court has a great desire to have this matter resolved on its merits, rather than by
2
involuntary dismissal. Thus, in light of plaintiffs’ pro se status and their recent appearance,
3
plaintiffs will be afforded a final opportunity to amend the complaint.
4
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
5
1. The court’s April 5, 2018 order and findings and recommendations (ECF No. 100) are
6
7
8
9
VACATED.
2. No later than May 10, 2018, plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint that complies
with the terms of the court’s January 17, 2018 order (ECF No. 91).
3. Failure to comply with the terms and deadlines of this order will result in a
10
recommendation of dismissal of the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of
11
Civil Procedure 41(b).
12
Dated: April 20, 2018
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
14/ps.17-1073.cho.vfrsanctions
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?