Shannon v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Filing
36
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 10/10/19 ADOPTING 35 Findings and Recommendations in full; Plaintiff's second amended complaint is DISMISSED without leave to amend for failure to state a claim; This action is DISMISSED; The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MYCHAEL TYRONE SHANNON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-CV-1084-JAM-DMC-P
v.
ORDER
RALPH DIAZ, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to
17
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
Eastern District of California local rules.
On August 16, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations
20
21
herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file
22
objections within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations
23
have been filed.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and the Magistrate Judge’s analysis.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The findings and recommendations filed August 16, 2019, are adopted in
2.
Plaintiff’s second amended complaint is dismissed without leave to amend
3
4
5
full;
for failure to state a claim;
6
3.
This action is dismissed; and
7
4.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.
8
9
Dated: October 10, 2019
/s/ John A. Mendez
HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
United States District Court Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?