Evans v. Foss, et al.
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/19/2018 DISMISSING this action with prejudice pursuant to 28 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
XAVIER BECERRA, State Bar No. 118517
Attorney General of California
JON S. ALLIN, State Bar No. 155069
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
ROBERT M. PERKINS, III, State Bar No. 309192
Deputy Attorney General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: (916) 210-6144
Facsimile: (916) 324-5205
E-mail: Robert.Perkins@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendants Foss, Fackrell, St. Andre, and
Harwell
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SACRAMENTO
12
13
Case No. 2:17-cv-1088 TLN KJN P
CLEVELAND EVANS,
STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY
Plaintiff, DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
(Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) AND
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH
PREJUDICE
14
15
v.
16
17
T. FOSS, et al.,
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
Plaintiff Cleveland Evans and Defendants Foss, Fackrell, St. Andre, and Harwell have
resolved this case in its entirety. Therefore, the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with
prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees.
It is so stipulated.
24
25
26
Dated:
August 30, 2018
/s/ Cleveland Evans
Plaintiff
27
28
1
Stip. Voluntary Dismissal [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] (2:17-CV-01088-TLN-KJN)
1
Dated:
8/29/18
/s/ Robert M. Perkins, III
Robert M. Perkins, III
Attorney for Defendants
2
3
4
In accordance with the parties’ stipulation, this action is dismissed with prejudice. The
Clerk of the Court shall close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
8
Dated: September 19, 2018
9
10
11
/evan1088.dsm
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Stip. Voluntary Dismissal [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] (2:17-CV-01088-TLN-KJN)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?