Evans v. Foss, et al.

Filing 29

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/19/2018 DISMISSING this action with prejudice pursuant to 28 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 XAVIER BECERRA, State Bar No. 118517 Attorney General of California JON S. ALLIN, State Bar No. 155069 Supervising Deputy Attorney General ROBERT M. PERKINS, III, State Bar No. 309192 Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 210-6144 Facsimile: (916) 324-5205 E-mail: Robert.Perkins@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants Foss, Fackrell, St. Andre, and Harwell 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO 12 13 Case No. 2:17-cv-1088 TLN KJN P CLEVELAND EVANS, STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY Plaintiff, DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE 14 15 v. 16 17 T. FOSS, et al., Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiff Cleveland Evans and Defendants Foss, Fackrell, St. Andre, and Harwell have resolved this case in its entirety. Therefore, the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees. It is so stipulated. 24 25 26 Dated: August 30, 2018 /s/ Cleveland Evans Plaintiff 27 28 1 Stip. Voluntary Dismissal [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] (2:17-CV-01088-TLN-KJN) 1 Dated: 8/29/18 /s/ Robert M. Perkins, III Robert M. Perkins, III Attorney for Defendants 2 3 4 In accordance with the parties’ stipulation, this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 8 Dated: September 19, 2018 9 10 11 /evan1088.dsm 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Stip. Voluntary Dismissal [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] (2:17-CV-01088-TLN-KJN)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?