Johnson v. Patel et al
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/27/2017 DENYING 11 Motion to be Heard to Vacate Default, 12 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice to their renewal following the Status Conference SET for 8/9/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire; ORDERING all parties to appear by counsel or in person if acting without counsel. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SCOTT JOHNSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-1090 JAM AC
v.
ORDER
VIJAY C. PATEL, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302(c)(21). Pending before the
18
court is defendants’ Motion to be Heard to Vacate Default (ECF No. 11) and Motion to Dismiss
19
(ECF No. 12). The motions will be denied without prejudice for failing to comply with E.D. Cal.
20
R. (“Local Rule”) 230.
21
The court has determined that the case will benefit from an early status conference.
22
Scheduling pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Local Rule 240 will be deferred to
23
a later date; this early status conference is intended only to educate defendants regarding court
24
procedures, address administrative matters suggested by defendants’ filings, and discuss ADR
25
options. Status reports are not required.
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
Defendants’ Motion to be Heard to Vacate Default (ECF No. 11) and Motion to Dismiss
3
(ECF No. 12) are DENIED without prejudice to their renewal following the status
4
conference.
5
6
7
2.
A Status Conference is set for August 9, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 26 before the
undersigned. All parties shall appear by counsel or in person if acting without counsel.
DATED: July 27, 2017.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?