Weaver v. California State Prison, Sacramento
Filing
6
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/26/17 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
WILLIE WEAVER,
11
12
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-1107-MCE-EFB P
Plaintiff,
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON,
SACRAMENTO, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42
18
U.S.C. § 1983. On June 6, 2017, the court found that plaintiff had failed to pay the $400 filing
19
fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) or request leave to proceed in forma pauperis and submit the
20
affidavit and trust account statement required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the court
21
ordered plaintiff to submit either the filing fee or the application required by § 1915(a) within
22
thirty days and warned him that failure to do so may result in this action being dismissed. ECF
23
No. 3. The time for acting has passed and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, submitted an
24
application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
25
Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
26
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
27
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
28
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
1
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
2
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
3
objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The
4
parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
5
appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez
6
v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
7
Dated: July 26, 2017.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?