Arismendez v. Muniz

Filing 4

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/5/2017 DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROLANDO ARISMENDEZ, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 15 v. No. 2:17-cv-1116-EFB P ORDER M.L. MUNIZ, Respondent. 16 17 Mr. Arismendez is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. This action was opened 18 when he filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. 19 However, he did not properly commence a civil action because the petition was not signed and he 20 had neither paid the filing fee nor sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 3; Rule 3, Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; Woodford v. Garceau, 538 U.S. 202, 203 (2003). 22 On June 2, 2017, the court informed him that it could not review his petition because he 23 had not signed it. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a) (requiring that “[e]very pleading, written motion, and 24 other paper . . . be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney’s name—or by a party 25 personally if the party is unrepresented.”). The court also warned him that this action would be 26 closed if he did not properly commence a civil action within 30 days, by filing a signed and 27 complete petition for writ of habeas corpus, and either paying the filing fee or filing an 28 application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Those 30 days 1 1 have passed and Mr. Arismendez has not filed the necessary documents or otherwise responded to 2 the court’s order. 3 4 5 6 As Mr. Arismendez has not submitted a petition and either paid the filing fee or met the in forma pauperis requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), there is simply no case before the court. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is hereby directed to close this case. DATED: July 5, 2017. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?