Evans et al v. ZB, N.A.
Filing
16
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 8/24/17 ORDERING that Plaintiffs shall file and serve their opposition, if any, to the Referral Motion on or before 9/11/17; CB&T shall file and serve its reply to any opposition to t he Referral Motion on or before 9/25/17; and The hearing on Referral Motions 7 shall be CONTINUED from 9/11/17 to 10/2/2017 at 01:30 PM. CB&T shall have until 20 calendar days after notice of withdrawal of the Referral Motion or notice to the Parties of the Court's entry of its written order ruling on the Referral Motion, whichever is first, in which to file an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Robert A. Curtis, State Bar No. 203870
rcurtis@foleybezek.com
Kevin D. Gamarnik, State Bar No. 273445
kgamarnik@foleybezek.com
Aaron L. Arndt, State Bar No. 290748
aarndt@foleybezek.com
FOLEY BEZEK BEHLE & CURTIS, LLP
15 West Carrillo Street
Santa Barbara CA 93101
Telephone: (805) 962-9495
Facsimile: (805) 962-0722
Attorney for Plaintiffs and all others similarly
situated
9
Robert L. Brace, State Bar No. 122240
rlbrace@rusty.lawyer
1807 Santa Barbara Street
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
Telephone: (805) 845-8211
Michael P. Denver, State Bar No. 199279
mpdenver@hbsb.com
HOLLISTER & BRACE,
a Professional Corporation
1126 Santa Barbara Street
Santa Barbara, CA 93101
Telephone: (805) 963-6711
Facsimile: (805) 965-0329
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
12
13
14
RONALD C. EVANS, an individual; JOAN M.
EVANS, an individual; DENNIS
TREADAWAY, an individual; and all others
similarly situated,
15
16
17
Plaintiffs,
vs.
ZB, N.A., a national banking association, dba
California Bank & Trust,
18
Defendant.
19
20
21
Case No. 2:17-cv-01123-WBS-DB
SECOND STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED ORDER]:
(1) CONTINUING THE HEARING ON
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO REFER
THIS CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT;
AND
(2) EXTENDING DEFENDANT ZB, N.A.’S
DEADLINE TO FILE A RESPONSIVE
PLEADING TO PLAINTIFFS’ CLASS
ACTION COMPLAINT
Date:
September 18, 2017
Time:
1:30 p.m.
Hon:
William B. Shubb
Courtroom: 5
Complaint Filed: May 26, 2017
Trial Date: None set
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING
DEFENDANT’S RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE
Case No. 2:17-cv-01123-WBS-DB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
STIPULATION
Plaintiffs Ronald C. Evans, Joan M. Evans, and Dennis Treadaway, (collectively, the
“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant ZB, N.A., a national banking association, doing business as
California Bank & Trust (“CB&T”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective
counsel of record, enter into the following stipulation (the “Stipulation”).
1.
On May 26, 2017, the Plaintiffs filed this Class Action Complaint (the
“Complaint”) against CB&T.
2.
On May 30, 2017, the Plaintiffs served the Summons and the Complaint upon
CB&T via personal service (the “Service Date”).
3.
Under Rule 12(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the deadline
for CB&T to file and serve its answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint was initially
June 20, 2017 (the “Response Deadline”).
4.
On June 12, 2017, this Court entered an Order granting the Parties’ Stipulation to
extend CB&T’s Response Deadline to July 31, 2017.
5.
On July 24, 2017, CB&T filed a Motion to Refer this Class Action Complaint to
the Honorable Robert S. Bardwil in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of
California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(a) and this Court’s General Orders 182, 223, and 330 (the
“Referral Motion”).
6.
The Referral Motion was initially scheduled to be heard by this Court on
August 21, 2017 at 1:30 p.m.
7.
The parties stipulated to continue the hearing date to September 18, 2017, at 1:30
P.M., with the Opposition to the Referral Motion to be filed on August 28, 2017, and the Reply to
be filed on September 11, 2017.
8.
In another action filed in Sacramento Superior Court involving the same purported
ponzi scheme, JTS Communities, Inc., et al. v. ZB, N.A., et al. action (“JTS Action”), CB&T
removed the case to U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California, the Honorable
Robert S. Bardwil presiding. On August 3, 2017, Judge Bardwil issued an order remanding the
28
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FURTHER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S
RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE
BN 29717493v4
Case No. 2:17-cv-01123-WBS-DB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
JTS Action to the Sacramento Superior Court.
9.
The Parties are meeting and conferring regarding whether Judge Bardwil’s ruling
in the JTS action has any bearing on CB&T’s Referral Motion in this action, and whether CB&T
may withdraw its Referral Motion.
10.
Thus, the Parties agree to the following schedule with respect to the Referral
Motion while the parties continue to meet and confer as to whether ZB, N.A., will withdraw its
Referral Motion:
8
a.
9
on or before September 11, 2017;
10
b.
11
c.
13
15
16
17
18
19
20
CB&T shall file and serve its reply to any opposition to the Referral
Motion on or before September 25, 2017; and
12
14
Plaintiffs shall file and serve their opposition, if any, to the Referral Motion
The hearing on Referral Motion shall be continued from September 18,
2017 at 1:30 p.m. to October 2, 2017, at 1:30 p.m.
11.
To allow time for this Court to hear and determine the Referral Motion in the event
that it is not withdrawn by CB&T, the Parties agree to further extend CB&T’s Response Deadline
such that CB&T shall have until 20 calendar days after notice of withdrawal of the Referral
Motion or notice to the Parties of the Court’s entry of its written order ruling on the Referral
Motion, whichever is first, in which to file an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.
This deadline shall apply regardless of whether this Court retains jurisdiction, or refers all or part
of this case to the Bankruptcy Court.
21
STIPULATED AND AGREED TO BY:
22
DATED: August 23, 2017
BUCHALTER, A Professional Corporation
23
24
By: /s/ Robert S. McWhorter
ROBERT S. MCWHORTER
25
Attorneys for Defendant,
ZB, N.A., a national banking association, dba
California Bank & Trust
26
27
28
BUCHALTER
A PROFES SION AL CORPORAT ION
SACR AMENTO
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FURTHER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S
RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE
BN 29717493v4
Case No. 2:17-cv-01123-WBS-DB
1
2
DATED: August 23, 2017
FOLEY BEZEK BEHLE & CURTIS LLP
3
By:
/s/ Kevin D. Gamarnik
KEVIN D. GAMARNIK
4
5
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and all others similarly
situated
6
7
I, the filer of this document, attest that each of the other signatories have consented to the
filing of this document.
8
9
/s/ Kevin D. Gamarnik___________
Kevin D. Gamarnik
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BUCHALTER
A PROFES SION AL CORPORAT ION
SACR AMENTO
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FURTHER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S
RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE
BN 29717493v4
Case No. 2:17-cv-01123-WBS-DB
1
2
3
ORDER
Based on the Parties’ Stipulation, and good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
4
1. Plaintiffs shall file and serve their opposition, if any, to the Referral Motion on or
5
before September 11, 2017;
6
2. CB&T shall file and serve its reply to any opposition to the Referral Motion on or
7
before September 25, 2017; and
8
3. The hearing on Referral Motion shall be continued from September 18, 2017 at
9
1:30 p.m. to October 2, 2017, at 1:30 p.m.
10
4. CB&T shall have until 20 calendar days after notice of withdrawal of the
11
Referral Motion or notice to the Parties of the Court’s entry of its written order
12
ruling on the Referral Motion, whichever is first, in which to file an answer or
13
otherwise respond to the Complaint. This deadline shall apply regardless of
14
whether this Court retains jurisdiction, or refers all or part of this case to the
15
16
Bankruptcy Court
Dated: August 24, 2017
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FURTHER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S
RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE
BN 29717493v4
Case No. 2:17-cv-01123-WBS-DB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?