Evans et al v. ZB, N.A.

Filing 16

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 8/24/17 ORDERING that Plaintiffs shall file and serve their opposition, if any, to the Referral Motion on or before 9/11/17; CB&T shall file and serve its reply to any opposition to t he Referral Motion on or before 9/25/17; and The hearing on Referral Motions 7 shall be CONTINUED from 9/11/17 to 10/2/2017 at 01:30 PM. CB&T shall have until 20 calendar days after notice of withdrawal of the Referral Motion or notice to the Parties of the Court's entry of its written order ruling on the Referral Motion, whichever is first, in which to file an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Robert A. Curtis, State Bar No. 203870 rcurtis@foleybezek.com Kevin D. Gamarnik, State Bar No. 273445 kgamarnik@foleybezek.com Aaron L. Arndt, State Bar No. 290748 aarndt@foleybezek.com FOLEY BEZEK BEHLE & CURTIS, LLP 15 West Carrillo Street Santa Barbara CA 93101 Telephone: (805) 962-9495 Facsimile: (805) 962-0722 Attorney for Plaintiffs and all others similarly situated 9 Robert L. Brace, State Bar No. 122240 rlbrace@rusty.lawyer 1807 Santa Barbara Street Santa Barbara, CA 93101 Telephone: (805) 845-8211 Michael P. Denver, State Bar No. 199279 mpdenver@hbsb.com HOLLISTER & BRACE, a Professional Corporation 1126 Santa Barbara Street Santa Barbara, CA 93101 Telephone: (805) 963-6711 Facsimile: (805) 965-0329 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 14 RONALD C. EVANS, an individual; JOAN M. EVANS, an individual; DENNIS TREADAWAY, an individual; and all others similarly situated, 15 16 17 Plaintiffs, vs. ZB, N.A., a national banking association, dba California Bank & Trust, 18 Defendant. 19 20 21 Case No. 2:17-cv-01123-WBS-DB SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER]: (1) CONTINUING THE HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO REFER THIS CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT; AND (2) EXTENDING DEFENDANT ZB, N.A.’S DEADLINE TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFFS’ CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT Date: September 18, 2017 Time: 1:30 p.m. Hon: William B. Shubb Courtroom: 5 Complaint Filed: May 26, 2017 Trial Date: None set 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE Case No. 2:17-cv-01123-WBS-DB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 STIPULATION Plaintiffs Ronald C. Evans, Joan M. Evans, and Dennis Treadaway, (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant ZB, N.A., a national banking association, doing business as California Bank & Trust (“CB&T”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, enter into the following stipulation (the “Stipulation”). 1. On May 26, 2017, the Plaintiffs filed this Class Action Complaint (the “Complaint”) against CB&T. 2. On May 30, 2017, the Plaintiffs served the Summons and the Complaint upon CB&T via personal service (the “Service Date”). 3. Under Rule 12(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the deadline for CB&T to file and serve its answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint was initially June 20, 2017 (the “Response Deadline”). 4. On June 12, 2017, this Court entered an Order granting the Parties’ Stipulation to extend CB&T’s Response Deadline to July 31, 2017. 5. On July 24, 2017, CB&T filed a Motion to Refer this Class Action Complaint to the Honorable Robert S. Bardwil in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(a) and this Court’s General Orders 182, 223, and 330 (the “Referral Motion”). 6. The Referral Motion was initially scheduled to be heard by this Court on August 21, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. 7. The parties stipulated to continue the hearing date to September 18, 2017, at 1:30 P.M., with the Opposition to the Referral Motion to be filed on August 28, 2017, and the Reply to be filed on September 11, 2017. 8. In another action filed in Sacramento Superior Court involving the same purported ponzi scheme, JTS Communities, Inc., et al. v. ZB, N.A., et al. action (“JTS Action”), CB&T removed the case to U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California, the Honorable Robert S. Bardwil presiding. On August 3, 2017, Judge Bardwil issued an order remanding the 28 -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE BN 29717493v4 Case No. 2:17-cv-01123-WBS-DB 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 JTS Action to the Sacramento Superior Court. 9. The Parties are meeting and conferring regarding whether Judge Bardwil’s ruling in the JTS action has any bearing on CB&T’s Referral Motion in this action, and whether CB&T may withdraw its Referral Motion. 10. Thus, the Parties agree to the following schedule with respect to the Referral Motion while the parties continue to meet and confer as to whether ZB, N.A., will withdraw its Referral Motion: 8 a. 9 on or before September 11, 2017; 10 b. 11 c. 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 CB&T shall file and serve its reply to any opposition to the Referral Motion on or before September 25, 2017; and 12 14 Plaintiffs shall file and serve their opposition, if any, to the Referral Motion The hearing on Referral Motion shall be continued from September 18, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. to October 2, 2017, at 1:30 p.m. 11. To allow time for this Court to hear and determine the Referral Motion in the event that it is not withdrawn by CB&T, the Parties agree to further extend CB&T’s Response Deadline such that CB&T shall have until 20 calendar days after notice of withdrawal of the Referral Motion or notice to the Parties of the Court’s entry of its written order ruling on the Referral Motion, whichever is first, in which to file an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. This deadline shall apply regardless of whether this Court retains jurisdiction, or refers all or part of this case to the Bankruptcy Court. 21 STIPULATED AND AGREED TO BY: 22 DATED: August 23, 2017 BUCHALTER, A Professional Corporation 23 24 By: /s/ Robert S. McWhorter ROBERT S. MCWHORTER 25 Attorneys for Defendant, ZB, N.A., a national banking association, dba California Bank & Trust 26 27 28 BUCHALTER A PROFES SION AL CORPORAT ION SACR AMENTO -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE BN 29717493v4 Case No. 2:17-cv-01123-WBS-DB 1 2 DATED: August 23, 2017 FOLEY BEZEK BEHLE & CURTIS LLP 3 By: /s/ Kevin D. Gamarnik KEVIN D. GAMARNIK 4 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and all others similarly situated 6 7 I, the filer of this document, attest that each of the other signatories have consented to the filing of this document. 8 9 /s/ Kevin D. Gamarnik___________ Kevin D. Gamarnik 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BUCHALTER A PROFES SION AL CORPORAT ION SACR AMENTO -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE BN 29717493v4 Case No. 2:17-cv-01123-WBS-DB 1 2 3 ORDER Based on the Parties’ Stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 4 1. Plaintiffs shall file and serve their opposition, if any, to the Referral Motion on or 5 before September 11, 2017; 6 2. CB&T shall file and serve its reply to any opposition to the Referral Motion on or 7 before September 25, 2017; and 8 3. The hearing on Referral Motion shall be continued from September 18, 2017 at 9 1:30 p.m. to October 2, 2017, at 1:30 p.m. 10 4. CB&T shall have until 20 calendar days after notice of withdrawal of the 11 Referral Motion or notice to the Parties of the Court’s entry of its written order 12 ruling on the Referral Motion, whichever is first, in which to file an answer or 13 otherwise respond to the Complaint. This deadline shall apply regardless of 14 whether this Court retains jurisdiction, or refers all or part of this case to the 15 16 Bankruptcy Court Dated: August 24, 2017 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER EXTENDING DEFENDANT’S RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE BN 29717493v4 Case No. 2:17-cv-01123-WBS-DB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?