Weaver v. Theo
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 06/06/17 ordering that plaintiff is granted 14 days within which to pay the $400.00 filing fee for this action. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WILLIE WEAVER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-1132 CKD P
v.
ORDER
THEO,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil action. This proceeding
17
was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
18
Plaintiff has not paid the $400 filing fee for this action and he is precluded from
19
proceeding in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).1 Good cause appearing, the court will
20
grant plaintiff 14 days within which to pay the filing fee. If plaintiff fails to pay the filing fee
21
within 14 days this action will be dismissed.
22
/////
23
/////
24
25
26
27
28
1
The court has disposed of approximately 200 cases filed by plaintiff since 2004. As plaintiff
knows well by now, he has “struck out” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff was last identified
as a “three strikes” litigant June 27, 2016 in Weaver v. Sacramento Police Dep’t, 2:15-1832 GEB
AC P. Being a “three strikes” litigant, plaintiff may only proceed in forma pauperis if he alleges
he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury in his pleadings. Plaintiff’s pleadings
concern denial of envelopes.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff is granted fourteen days within
2
which to pay the $400 filing fee for this action. Failure to pay the filing fee within fourteen days
3
will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.
4
Dated: June 6, 2017
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
weav1132.3ks
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?