Canseco v. Spearman et al
Filing
10
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 4/05/18 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
EDGAR JOSE CANSECO,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
No. 2:17-cv-1133 DB P
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
M.E. SPEARMAN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
By order issued January 9, 2018, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave
18
to file an amended complaint was granted. (See ECF No. 7). Thirty days from that date have
19
now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the
20
court’s order.
21
22
23
24
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a
United States District Judge to this action.
IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See
Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
25
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
26
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
27
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
28
with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings
1
1
and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified
2
time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153
3
(9th Cir. 1991).
4
Dated: April 5, 2018
5
6
7
8
9
DLB:13
DB/ORDERS/ORDERS.PRISONER.CIVIL RIGHTS/cans1133.fta
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?