Plasse et al v. Ford
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/8/2020 GRANTING IN PART 45 Motion for Extension; CONTINUING the Initial Scheduling Conference to 10/14/2020 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan; DIRECTI NG defendant to submit a status report addressing thematters set forth in 43 Scheduling Order by 9/30/2020; ADMONISHING defendant that the court may schedule this case without her input should she fail to timely file a status report; and DIRECTING the clerk to send defendant a copy of the 43 Scheduling Order. (Coll, A)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MAURICE JOHN PLASSE, III, AND
JEANNIE LYNNE PLASSE,
No. 2:17-cv-1136-TLN-EFB PS
The court previously set an initial scheduling conference for September 9, 2020, and
ordered the parties to file status reports by no later than August 26, 2020. ECF No. 43. Plaintiffs
timely filed a status report. ECF No. 44. Defendant, instead of submitting a status report, filed a
request to continue the scheduling conference for at least 120 days. ECF No. 45.
Defendant, who is in propria persona, explains that she has been attempting to obtain new
legal counsel1, but her efforts have been frustrated by the current Covid-19 pandemic. Id. at 2.
She contends that she has sent several e-mails to prospective counsel but has not received a
The court previously granted plaintiff’s former attorney’s motion to withdraw as
counsel. ECF No. 41.
Defendant’s former attorney withdrew as counsel in September 2019. Thus, defendant
has had nearly a year—including several months prior to the ongoing pandemic—to seek and
obtain representation. If defendant cannot find an attorney willing to take on her case, she must at
some point make diligent efforts to proceed on her own. Given that defendant is currently
proceeding without counsel, the court will grant her a brief continuance of the scheduling
conference. However, defendant is admonished that her request is being granted to permit her to
prepare and file a status report addressing the issues delineated in the court’s August 10, 2020
order. See ECF No. 43. While she may certainly continue to seek representation, she must
proceed with litigating this case. The court is not inclined to grant further requests to continue the
scheduling conference based on a failure to obtain new counsel.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendant’s request to continue the September 9, 2020 scheduling conference (ECF
No. 45) is granted in part.
2. The initial scheduling conference currently set for September 9, 2020 is continued to
October 14, 2020 at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 8.2
3. On or before September 30, 2020, defendant shall submit a status report addressing the
matters set forth in the court’s August 10, 2020 order.
4. Defendant is admonished that should she fail to timely file a status report, the court
may schedule this case without her input.
5. The clerk is directed to send defendant a copy of the court’s August 10, 2020 order.
DATED: September 8, 2020.
Plaintiffs have filed a motion to sever claims and dismiss two of their claims as moot.
ECF No. 47. That motion is currently set for hearing on October 14, 2020. Id. Defendant is
hereby notified that pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), she is required to file an opposition or
statement of non-opposition to that motion by September 30, 2020.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?