Awadan et al v. Reebok Corporate Headquarter
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 07/27/17 ORDERING that the hearing on the 10 Amended Motion to Dismiss is CONTINUED to 8/16/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire; plaintiff shall file a n opposition or a Statement of Non-Opposition to the motion, by 08/02/17. Failure to file an opposition or to appear at the hearing will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Benson, A.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FAIZAL AWADAN and SHAINAZ
No. 2:17-cv-1148 KJM AC (PS)
HEADQUARTER, also known as Reebok
Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the
undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On June 9, 2017, defendant filed a motion to dismiss.
ECF No. 10. Plaintiffs submitted a response on June 19, 2017. ECF No. 14. Plaintiffs’ response
does not address the substance of defendant’s motion to dismiss. Instead, it asks the court to
remand the case because three defendants, other than the named defendant, are not diverse. Id. at
2. This filing was not properly noted as a motion for remand, and the deadline to move for
remand has now expired. 28 U.S.C. § 1447. Incidentally, the court notes that there is only one
named defendant in this case, Reebok International Ltd., and plaintiffs admit that this defendant is
Plaintiffs did not submit a proper response to defendant’s motion addressing the substance
of defendant’s argument. Local Rule 230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion
must be filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Local Rule further provides
that “[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written
opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” In addition, Local Rule 230(j)
provides that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may
result in sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules
“may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within
the inherent power of the Court.”
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The motion hearing date of August 9, 2017 is CONTINUED to August 16, 2017,
at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 26;
2. Plaintiff shall file an opposition – or a Statement of Non-Opposition – to the
motion, no later than August 2, 2017. Failure to file an opposition or to appear at
the hearing will be deemed as a statement of non-opposition and shall result in a
recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 41(b); and
3. Failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this court’s Local
Rules, and this order may result in dismissal of this case.
DATED: July 27, 2017.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?