Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP v. EngagePoint, Inc.

Filing 13

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 06/08/17 ORDERING that, pursuant to 10 Stipulation, the 1 Petition shall be submitted upon the record and briefs on file with the Court. (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 5 J.R. RIDDELL (State Bar No. 225004) jriddell@orrick.com ERIC R. OLAH (State Bar No. 295513) olah@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 3000 Sacramento, CA 95814-4497 Telephone: (916) 447-9200 Facsimile: (916) 329-4900 6 Attorneys for Petitioner 2 3 4 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, LLP, Case No. 2:17-cv-01163-KJM-KJN 12 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO SUBMIT THE PETITION UPON THE RECORD AND BRIEFS ON FILE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 230(g) Petitioner, 13 v. 14 ENGAGEPOINT, INC., EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION REQUESTED 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 WHEREAS, Petitioner Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP (“Petitioner”) and 19 Respondent EngagePoint, Inc. (“Respondent”) commenced arbitration to resolve a dispute over 20 Respondent’s unpaid legal fees; 21 WHEREAS, Petitioner and Respondent executed a settlement agreement and several 22 exhibits thereto to resolve the arbitration dispute on May 26, 2017; 23 WHEREAS, the Arbitrator presiding over the arbitration entered, pursuant to a stipulation 24 of Petitioner and Respondent, a Final Award on June 1, 2017; 25 WHEREAS, Petitioner filed in this Court a Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award and for 26 Entry of Judgement on June 2, 2017 (ECF No. 1); 27 /// 28 OHSUSA:766967054.1 -1- ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 230(G) (CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01163-KJM-KJN) 1 2 WHEREAS, Petitioner submitted in support of the Petition a declaration from James E. Carbine (ECF No. 1-3) on June 2, 2017; 3 WHEREAS, Mr. Carbine’s declaration states that he serves as counsel for Respondent, 4 that “Respondent does not seek to have the Arbitration Award vacated, modified, or corrected[,]” 5 and that “Respondent does not oppose the Petition to Confirm Arbitration Consent Award and 6 Entry of Judgment, which seeks confirmation of the Arbitration Award and entry of judgment in 7 Petitioner’s favor in the amount of $1,544,883.68,” (ECF No. 1-3); and 8 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Petitioner and Respondent that, pursuant 9 to Local Rule 230(c), Mr. Carbine’s declaration and this Stipulation shall serve as Respondent’s 10 statement of non-opposition to the granting of the Petition. 11 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED by and between Petitioner and Respondent that, pursuant 12 to Local Rule 230(g), the Petition shall be submitted upon the record and briefs on file with the 13 Court. Furthermore, Petitioner and Respondent jointly request that the Court give the Petition 14 expedited consideration and grant the relief requested in the Petition at the Court’s earliest 15 convenience. 16 Dated: June 7, 2017. 17 SANDRA L. SAVA Meissner, Joseph & Palley 18 By: 19 20 21 Dated: June 7, 2017. 22 /s/ Sandra L. Sava (as authorized on June 7, 2017) SANDRA L. SAVA Attorneys for Respondent ERIC R. OLAH Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP 23 By: 24 25 26 /// 27 /// 28 /s/ Eric R. Olah ERIC R. OLAH Attorneys for Petitioner /// OHSUSA:766967054.1 -2- ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 230(G) (CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01163-KJM-KJN) 1 2 ORDER Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) and the foregoing stipulation between Petitioner Orrick, 3 Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP and Respondent EngagePoint, Inc., the Petition (ECF No. 1) shall be 4 submitted upon the record and briefs on file with the Court. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 8, 2017. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OHSUSA:766967054.1 -3- ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 230(G) (CASE NO. 2:17-CV-01163-KJM-KJN)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?