Davies v. Premier Community Credit Union et al

Filing 20

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/8/17, ORDERING that Plaintiffs Matthew Davies and Molly Thompson are GRANTED leave to file an Amended Complaint, to be filed with the Court within ten (10) days of this Order. Defendant Premier Community Credit Union's responsive pleading shall be due 30 days after the Amended Complaint is filed. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 ERIC O. JEPPSON (SBN 212287) BRIAN E. HAMILTON (SBN 295994) 2 HUNT JEPPSON & GRIFFIN, LLP 3 4 5 6 1478 Stone Point Drive, Suite 100 Roseville, CA 95661 Telephone: (916) 780-7008 Facsimile: (916) 780-7118 Attorneys for Plaintiffs MATTHEW DAVIES MOLLY THOMPSON 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 –o0o– 12 CASE NO. 2:17-cv-01180-TLN-CKD MATTHEW DAVIES; MOLLY THOMPSON 13 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, 14 15 v. 16 17 1478 Stone Point Drive, Suite 100, Roseville, CA 95661 HUNT JEPPSON & GRIFFIN, LLP 18 PREMIER COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION, A NONPROFIT CORPORATION; EQUIFAX INC., A CORPORATION; EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., A CORPORATION, 19 Defendants. 20 21 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective 22 attorneys of record that Plaintiffs may file an Amended Complaint, a copy of which is attached 23 hereto. 24 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that Defendants waive notice and service of the 25 Amended Complaint. 26 Defendants Equifax, Inc. and Experian Information Solutions, Inc., (collectively referred to hereinafter as “Reporting Agency Defendants”) shall not be required to 27 answer the Amended Complaint, and that all denials, responses, and affirmative defenses 28 29 -1STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 contained in the answers filed by the Reporting Agency Defendants to the original Complaint 2 shall be responsive to the Amended Complaint. 3 4 Dated: September 8, 2017 5 BY: /s/ Brian E. Hamilton Brian E. Hamilton Attorney for Plaintiff MATTHEW DAVIES 6 7 8 HUNT JEPPSON & GRIFFIN, LLP Dated: September 8, 2017 ROXANNE T. DANERI, P.C. BY: /S/ Roxanne T. Daneri Roxanne T. Daneri Attorney for Defendant PREMIER COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION 9 10 11 Dated: September 8, 2017 JONES DAY 12 BY: /S/ Donna Woo Donna Woo Attorney for Defendant EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. 13 14 15 Dated: September 8, 2017 16 BY: /s/ Thomas P. Quinn Jr. Thomas P. Quinn Jr. Attorney for Defendant EQUIFAX INC. 17 1478 Stone Point Drive, Suite 100, Roseville, CA 95661 18 HUNT JEPPSON & GRIFFIN, LLP NOKES & QUINN 19 Dated: September 8, 2017 SCHUCKIT & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 20 21 22 23 BY: /s/ Scott E. Brady Scott E. Brady Attorney for Defendant TRANS UNION, LLC 24 25 26 27 28 29 -2STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 ORDER 2 The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation of the Parties and good cause appearing, 3 4 therefore: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Matthew Davies and Molly Thompson are 5 granted leave to file an Amended Complaint, which is to be filed with the Court within ten 6 (10) days of this Order. 7 IT IS ALSO ORDERED that Defendant Premier Community Credit Union’s responsive 8 pleading shall be due thirty (30) days after the Amended Complaint is filed. Defendants Equifax, 9 Inc. and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (collectively referred to hereinafter as “Reporting 10 Agency Defendants”) shall not be required to answer the Amended Complaint, and all denials, 11 responses, and affirmative defenses contained in the answers filed by the Reporting Agency 12 Defendants to the original Complaint shall be responsive to the Amended Complaint. 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 Dated: September 8, 2017 17 1478 Stone Point Drive, Suite 100, Roseville, CA 95661 HUNT JEPPSON & GRIFFIN, LLP 18 19 20 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 -3STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?