Johnson v. Sharma et al
Filing
7
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO VDRP AND STAYING PROCEEDINGS signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/3/2017 ORDERING: The court has determined that this case is appropriate for an early settlement conference and will refer the action to the court' ;s Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program ("VDRP"). Within fourteen (14) days of this Order, the parties shall contact the court's VDRP administrator, Sujean Park, at (916) 930-4278 or SPark@caed.uscourts.gov, to start the process of selecting an appropriate neutral. Any party that objects to this referral to the VDRP shall file its objections within seven (7) days of this Order. The parties shall complete the VDRP session no later than 12/5/2017. The court hereby reset s the Scheduling Conference for 1/16/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. If a settlement is not reached through VDRP, the parties shall submit an Amended Joint Status Report no later than 1/2/2018. [See document for further details.] cc: VDRP Admin. (Kirksey Smith, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
----oo0oo----
11
12
SCOTT JOHNSON,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO VDRP AND
STAYING PROCEEDINGS
v.
RAJ KUMAR SHARMA; NAMARTA
SHARMA; SRIHAN ENTERPRISE,
INC., a California
Corporation; and Does 1-10,
Defendants.
18
----oo0oo----
19
20
NO. CIV. 2:17-01183 WBS CKD
The court has determined that this case is appropriate
21
for an early settlement conference and will refer the action to
22
the court’s Voluntary Dispute Resolution Program (“VDRP”).
23
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
24
1.
Within fourteen (14) days of this Order, the
25
parties shall contact the court’s VDRP administrator, Sujean
26
Park, at (916) 930-4278 or SPark@caed.uscourts.gov, to start the
27
process of selecting an appropriate neutral.
28
carefully review and comply with Local Rule 271, which outlines
1
The parties shall
1
the specifications and requirements of the VDRP.
2
2.
Any party that objects to this referral to the
3
VDRP shall file its objections within seven (7) days of this
4
Order.
5
believes that the action is not appropriate for referral to the
6
VDRP.
Such objections shall clearly outline why that party
7
3.
To avoid the unnecessary expenditure of costs and
8
attorneys’ fees, this action is hereby stayed to provide the
9
parties time to complete the VDRP session.
No later than five
10
(5) days after completion of the VDRP session, the parties shall
11
file a joint statement indicating whether a settlement was
12
reached.
13
4.
The parties shall complete the VDRP session no
14
later than December 5, 2017.
15
(Pretrial Scheduling) Conference for January 16, 2018 at
16
1:30 p.m.
17
parties shall submit an Amended Joint Status Report no later than
18
January 2, 2018.
19
20
The court hereby resets the Status
If a settlement is not reached through VDRP, the
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 3, 2017
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?