Belyew v. Honea et al
Filing
12
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/6/2017 ORDERING the Clerk to randomly assign this case to a US District Judge and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LISA BELYEW,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-01189 CKD P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER AND
SHERIFF HONEA, et al.,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
Defendant.
16
17
By order filed September 1, 2017, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days
18
leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and
19
plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
20
21
22
23
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign this case to a
United States District Court judge.
24
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
25
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
26
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
27
with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings
28
and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified
1
1
time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153
2
(9th Cir. 1991).
3
Dated: December 6, 2017
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12/bely1189.fta.docx
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?