Mann et al v. City of Sacramento et al

Filing 13

RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 7/17/17: This action is related with member case 2:16-CV-1847 WBS DB and reassigned to Senior Judge William B. Shubb and Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. Any dates currently set in the reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the captions on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as 2:17-CV-1201 WBS DB.(Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
----oo0oo----

11
12
13
14
15

WILLIAM MANN, SR., Successorin—Interest to Decedent JOSEPH
MANN; ROBERT MANN, individually;
DEBORAH MANN, individually;
VERNADINE MURPHY MANN,
individually; and WILLIAM MANN,
JR., individually;

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF SACRAMENTO, a municipal
corporation; JOHN TENNIS, in
his individual and official
capacity as Police Officer for
the CITY OF SACRAMENTO; RANDY
LOZOYA, in his individual and
official capacity as Police
Officer for the CITY OF
SACRAMENTO; and DOES 1-50,
inclusive, individually and in
their official capacity as
Police Officers for the City of
Sacramento;
Defendants,
_______________________________

27
28
1

NO. 2:16-CV-01847 WBS DB

1
2
3

ROBERT MANN SR., VERN MURPHYMAN, DEBORAH MANN, ZACHARY MANN,
and WILLIAM MANN,
Plaintiffs,

4
5
6
7
8

NO. 2:17-CV-01201 KJM CKD

v.
CITY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO
POLICE DEPARTMENT, SAMUEL D.
SOMERS JR., JOHN C. TENNIS, AND
RANDY R. LOZOYA,
Defendants.

9
10
11

----oo0oo----

12

Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that

13
14

they are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123(a), because

15

both cases arise from the alleged shooting of decedent Joseph

16

Mann by defendants John Tennis and Randy Lozoya, police officers

17

of defendant City of Sacramento.

18

the matters to the same judge is likely to effect a substantial

19

saving of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for

20

the parties.

Accordingly, the assignment of

The parties should be aware that relating the cases

21
22

under Local Rule 123 merely has the result that both actions are

23

assigned to the same judge; no consolidation of the actions is

24

effected.

25

cases are generally assigned to the judge and magistrate judge to

26

whom the first filed action was assigned.

27
28

Under the regular practice of this court, related

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the actions denominated
Mann v. City of Sacramento, No. 2:16-CV-1847 WBS DB, and Mann v.
2

1

City of Sacramento, No. 2:17-CV-1201 KJM CKD, be, and the same

2

hereby are, deemed related.

3

Sacramento, No. 2:17-CV-1201 KJM CKD, shall be reassigned to the

4

Honorable WILLIAM B. SHUBB.

5

reassigned case only are hereby VACATED.

6

captions on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown

7

as Mann v. City of Sacramento, No. 2:17-CV-1201 WBS DB.

8
9

The case denominated Mann v. City of

Any dates currently set in the
Henceforth, the

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make
an appropriate adjustment in the assignment of cases to

10

compensate for this reassignment.

11

Dated:

July 17, 2017

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3