Mann et al v. City of Sacramento et al

Filing 82

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/30/2020 FINDING REASONABLE the requested appeal costs re 81 Bill of Costs. Accordingly, costs of $526.60 are TAXED against defendants. (York, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

----oo0oo----

11
12
13

ROBERT MANN, SR.; VERN MURPHYMANN; DEBORAH MANN; ZACHARY
MANN; and WILLIAM MANN,
Plaintiffs,

14
15
16
17

No. 2:17-cv-1201 WBS DB

ORDER

v.
CITY OF SACRAMENTO; SACRAMENTO
POLICE DEPARTMENT; SAMUEL D.
SOMERS, JR.; JOHN C. TENNIS; and
RANDY R. LOZOYA,

18

Defendants.

19
20

----oo0oo----

21
22
23
24

Before the court is plaintiffs’ Bill of Costs, which
seeks plaintiffs’ appellate filing fee, fees for the trial
transcript necessarily used on appeal, and “Costs as shown on the
Mandate of Court of Appeals.”

25
26

(Docket No. 81).

On appeal, the Ninth Circuit panel awarded costs to
plaintiff in the amount of $81.90.1

Federal Rule of Appellate

27
28

1

The court’s examination of the Ninth Circuit docket
1

1

Procedure 39(e) provides that costs for the reporter’s transcript

2

and the fee for filling the appeal may be taxed in the district

3

court.

4

defendants have not objected, the court finds the requested

5

appeal costs are reasonable.

6

taxed against defendants.2

7
8

After reviewing the bill, and in light of the fact that

Accordingly, costs of $526.60 are

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

June 30, 2020

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

indicates that on appeal, plaintiffs were awarded $81.90 in costs
for preparing excerpts of records and briefs.
Because the Ninth Circuit already taxed costs in the
amount of $81.90 against defendants, this court need not tax
those costs once again.
2

28
2