Mann et al v. City of Sacramento et al

Filing 91

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 11/23/2020 ORDERING that defendants John C. Tennis and Randy R. Lozoya shall file an amended motion to dismiss by 1/15/20201. Plaintiffs' opposition shall be filed by 1/29/2021. Any reply shall be filed by 2/5/2021. The court will hear the motion on 2/22/2021 at 2:00 pm. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

----oo0oo----

11
12
13

ROBERT MANN, SR.; VERN MURPHYMANN; DEBORAH MANN; ZACHARY
MANN; and WILLIAM MANN,
Plaintiffs,

14
15
16
17

No. 2:17-cv-1201 WBS DB

ORDER

v.
CITY OF SACRAMENTO; SACRAMENTO
POLICE DEPARTMENT; SAMUEL D.
SOMERS, JR.; JOHN C. TENNIS; and
RANDY R. LOZOYA,

18

Defendants.

19
20

----oo0oo----

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Pursuant to the discussion with the parties at the
status conference held on November 23, 2020, in light of the
Ninth Circuit’s mandate issued June 18, 2020, defendants John C.
Tennis and Randy R. Lozoya shall file an amended motion to
dismiss by January 15, 2021.
filed by January 29, 2021.
5, 2021.

Plaintiffs’ opposition shall be

Any reply shall be filed by February

The court will hear the motion on February 22, 2021 at

28
1

1

2:00 pm.

2
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

November 23, 2020

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2