Lull v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 58

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/6/2020 ADOPTING 50 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING 42 Motion for Reconsideration. (Huang, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CHRISTOPHER LULL,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:17-cv-1211-TLN-EFB

v.

ORDER

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, CORY
STEWART, MICHAEL DOANE, and
DOES 1 to 100,

16

Defendants.

17
18

On December 19, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

19

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings

20

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 50.) No objections were

21

filed.
The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

22
23

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

24
25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

1
2
3

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed December 19, 2019 (ECF No. 50),
are ADOPTED IN FULL; and
2. Defendant’s Motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 42) is denied.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5

Dated: March 6, 2020

6
7
8

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2