Lebbad v. Restaurant Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 27

ORDER AFTER HEARING signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/12/2018 GRANTING 15 Motion to Compel. Defendant shall produce documents responsive to plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents Number 21 and produce for deposition its person most knowledgeable regarding defendant's financial conditional. Such discovery shall be limited to information concerning defendant's financial condition from November 2014 through present. The parties shall submit a proposed protective order governing the exchange of confidential financial information by 6/13/2018. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY LEBBAD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-1220-MCE-EFB v. ORDER AFTER HEARING RESTAURANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and DOES ONE THROUGH FIFTY, Defendants. 16 17 18 This case was before the court on June 6, 2018, for hearing on plaintiff’s motion to 19 compel the production of documents and further deposition of defendant’s Rule 30(b)(6) witness. 20 ECF No. 15. Attorney Alexander Rusnak appeared on behalf of plaintiff. Attorneys Pamela 21 Woodside and Yifei Chang appeared on behalf of defendant.1 22 For the reasons stated on the record, plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 15) is granted. 23 Defendant shall produce documents responsive to plaintiff’s Request for Production of 24 Documents Number 21 and produce for deposition its person most knowledgeable regarding 25 defendant’s financial conditional. Such discovery shall be limited to information concerning 26 defendant’s financial condition from November 2014 through present. The parties shall submit a 27 28 1 Mr. Rusnak and Ms. Woodside appeared by telephone. 1 1 proposed protective order governing the exchange of confidential financial information by June 2 13, 2018. 3 4 So Ordered. DATED: June 12, 2018. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?