Gomez v. CDCR et al
Filing
31
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO POST-SCREENING ADR PROJECT AND STAYING CASE FOR 120 DAYS. The parties shall file the attached notice re settlement conference within 30 days of this order. The assigned DAG shall contact Courtroom Deputy within 30 days to sch edule a settlement conference. Each party shall submit a confidential settlement conference statement at least 7 days prior to the conference. If settlement is reached, the parties shall file a Notice of Settlement. The Clerk shall serve copies of (a) plaintiff's complaint, (b) the screening order, and (c) the instant order, on Supervising DAG Christopher Becker. (cc: Christopher Becker and Thomas Cregger) signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/07/18. (Plummer, M) Modified on 12/7/2018 (Plummer, M).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
EDWARD GOMEZ,
12
No. 2: 17-cv-1247 JAM KJN P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
AMENDED ORDER REFERRING CASE TO
POST-SCREENING ADR PROJECT AND
STAYING CASE FOR 120 DAYS
CDCR, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. On July 12, 2017, the
17
18
undersigned ordered the U.S. Marshal to serve defendant process on defendant Diaz. On October
19
15, 2018, defendant Diaz filed the waiver of service form. (ECF No. 26.) On October 18, 2018,
20
the undersigned issued an order referring this action to the Post-Screening ADR Project. (ECF
21
No. 27.) This order was served on plaintiff and Supervising Deputy Attorney General Becker.
22
(Id.)
On November 6, 2018, defendant Diaz filed a response to the October 18, 2018 order
23
24
referring this action to the Post-Screening ADR Project. (ECF No. 30.) Defendant Diaz states
25
that he is not represented by the Office of the Attorney General. (Id.) Defendant Diaz is
26
represented by private counsel.1 (Id.) Defendant requests that the court re-issue the October 18,
27
28
1
The November 6, 2018 pleading states that California Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation asked private counsel to represent defendant Diaz in this matter, in place of the
1
1
2018 order, noting the correct representation of defendant Diaz. (Id.) Defendant Diaz requests
2
that the dates discussed in the October 18, 2018 order run from the date the order is re-issued.
3
(Id.)
4
Good cause appearing, the undersigned herein re-issues the order referring this action to
5
the Post-Screening ADR Project. The dates discussed in the order run from the date the order is
6
filed. On November 2, 2018, plaintiff filed the form indicating that he consents to the
7
undersigned participating in the settlement conference. (ECF No. 29.) Plaintiff is not required to
8
resubmit this form.
9
The undersigned is referring all post-screening civil rights cases filed by pro se inmates to
10
the Post-Screening ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Project in an effort to resolve such
11
cases more expeditiously and less expensively. Defendant is represented by attorney Thomas A.
12
Cregger. No defenses or objections shall be waived by counsel’s participation.
13
As set forth in the screening order, plaintiff has stated a potentially cognizable civil rights
14
claim. Thus, the court stays this action for a period of 120 days to allow the parties to investigate
15
plaintiff’s claims, meet and confer, and then participate in a settlement conference.
16
There is a presumption that all post-screening civil rights cases assigned to the
17
undersigned will proceed to settlement conference.2 However, if after investigating plaintiff’s
18
claims and speaking with plaintiff, defense counsel in good faith finds that a settlement
19
conference would be a waste of resources, defense counsel may move to opt out of this pilot
20
project.
21
By filing the attached notice within thirty days, defendant Diaz shall notify the court
22
whether he waives disqualification for the undersigned to hold the settlement conference or
23
whether he requests a different judge. Failure to timely file such notice will result in the case
24
being set for settlement conference before a different judge.
25
////
26
27
28
Office of the Attorney General.
2
If the case does not settle, the court will set a date for the filing of a responsive pleading at the
conference.
2
1
Within thirty days, Thomas A. Cregger shall contact the Courtroom Deputy, Alexandra
2
Waldrop, at (916) 930-4187, to schedule the settlement conference. If difficulties arise in
3
scheduling the settlement conference due to the court’s calendar, the parties may seek an
4
extension of the initial 120 day stay.
5
Once the settlement conference is scheduled, at least seven days prior to conference, the
6
parties shall submit to the assigned settlement judge a confidential settlement conference
7
statement. The parties’ confidential settlement conference statement shall include the following:
8
(a) names and locations of the parties; (b) a short statement of the facts and alleged damages; (c) a
9
short procedural history; (d) an analysis of the risk of liability, including a discussion of the
10
efforts made to investigate the allegations; and (e) a discussion of the efforts that have been made
11
to settle the case.
12
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
13
1. This action is stayed for 120 days to allow the parties an opportunity to settle their
14
dispute before a responsive pleading is filed, or the discovery process begins. Except as provided
15
herein or by subsequent court order, no other pleadings or other documents may be filed in this
16
case during the stay of this action. The parties shall not engage in formal discovery, but the
17
parties may elect to engage in informal discovery.
18
2. Within thirty days from the date of this order, defendant Diaz shall file the attached
19
notice, informing the court whether he waives disqualification for the undersigned to hold the
20
settlement conference, or whether he chooses to have the settlement conference held by a
21
different judge.
22
3. Within thirty days from the date of this order, Thomas A. Cregger shall contact this
23
court’s Courtroom Deputy, Alexandra Waldrop, at (916) 930-4187, to schedule the settlement
24
conference.
25
4. At least seven days prior to the settlement conference, each party shall submit a
26
confidential settlement conference statement, as described above, to the judge assigned for
27
settlement.
28
////
3
1
2
5. If a settlement is reached at any point during the stay of this action, the parties shall file
a Notice of Settlement in accordance with Local Rule 160.
3
6. The Clerk of the Court shall serve copies of (a) plaintiff’s amended complaint (ECF
4
No. 16, (b) the screening order (ECF No. 17), and (c) the instant order, on attorney Thomas A.
5
Cregger.
6
7. The parties remain obligated to keep the court informed of their current address at all
7
times during the stay and while the action is pending. Any change of address must be reported
8
promptly to the court in a separate document captioned for this case and entitled “Notice of
9
Change of Address.” See L.R. 182(f).
10
Dated: December 7, 2018
11
12
13
14
15
16
Gomez1247.adr(2)
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
EDWARD GOMEZ,
7
8
9
No. 2: 17-cv-1247 JAM KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
NOTICE RE: JUDGE ELECTION FOR
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE (POSTSCREENING ADR PROJECT)
CDCR, et al.,
10
Defendants.
11
12
13
1. As required by court order, the parties notify the court of the following election:
____ Pursuant to Local Rule 270(b) of the Eastern District of California, the party signing
14
below affirmatively requests that the assigned Magistrate Judge participate in the settlement
15
conference and, further, waives any claim of disqualification of the assigned Magistrate Judge on
16
that basis thereafter. This waiver is not to be construed as consent to the Magistrate Judge’s
17
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1).
18
19
20
OR
____ The party signing below requests that a different judge hold the settlement
conference.
21
22
DATED:
23
________________________________
Counsel for Defendant
24
25
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?